Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26735540›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2016

Adrenomedullin for Risk Stratification of Emergency Patients With Nonspecific Complaints: An Interventional Multicenter Pilot Study.

Christian Hans Nickel, Anna Sarah Messmer, Leyla Ghanim, Julia Ilsemann-Karakoumis, Sven Giersdorf, Sabine Hertel, Susanne Ernst, Nicolas Geigy, Roland Bingisser

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00920491 (BANC4), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00920491 completednot on this map

BANC4 (BASEL NON - SPECIFIC COMPLAINTS 4) Biomarker-enhanced Disposition Decisions

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandRan2011 to 2014Enrolled400ConditionsNon-specific ComplaintsArmsbiomarker-enhanced disposition decision with proADM
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christian Hans NickelFrom the Emergency Department, University Hospital, Basel (CHN, ASM, LG, JI-K, RB); Emergency Department, Kantonsspital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland (NG); Research Department, Thermo Scientific Biomarkers, Hennigsdorf, Germany (SG, SH); and Emergency Department, Kantonsspital Olten, Olten, Switzerland (SE).
Anna Sarah Messmer
Leyla Ghanim
Julia Ilsemann-Karakoumis
Sven Giersdorf
Sabine Hertel
Susanne Ernst
Nicolas Geigy
Roland Bingisser

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with nonspecific complaints (NSC) presenting to the emergency department (ED) are at risk of life-threatening conditions. New stress biomarkers such as the midregional portion of adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) promise to support decision-making. This study tested the following hypotheses: biomarker-assisted disposition of patients with NSC will not increase mortality. Second, discharge from the ED will increase if clinical risk assessment is combined with low MR-proADM levels. Third, inappropriate disposition to a lower level of care will decrease, if clinical assessment is combined with high MR-proADM levels, and fourth that this algorithm is feasible in the ED setting. Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled interventional feasibility study with a 30-day follow-up, including patients with NSC. Patients were randomly assigned to either the standard group (decision-making solely based on clinical assessment) or the Novum group (biomarker-assisted). Regarding disposition, patients were assigned to 1 of 3 risk classes: high-risk (admission to hospital), intermediate risk (community geriatric hospital), and low-risk patients (discharge). In the Novum group, in addition to clinical risk assessment, the information of the MR-proADM level was used. Unless there were overruling criteria, patients were transferred or discharged according to the risk assessment. Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were comparisons of patient disposition and related mortality rates, ED, and hospital length of stay and readmission. The final study cohort consisted of 398 patients (210 in the Standard group and 188 in the Novum group). Overruling, that is, disposition not according to the result of the proposed algorithm occurred in 51 cases. Baseline characteristics between Standard and Novum groups were similar. The mortality rate in the Novum group was 4.3%, as compared to the Standard group mortality of 6.2%, which was not significantly different (intention-to treat analysis). This was confirmed by the perprotocol analysis as well as by sensitivity analysis. For the secondary endpoints, no significant differences were detected. Biomarker-assisted disposition is safe in patients with NSC. Discharge rates did not increase. Feasibility could only partly be shown due to an unexpectedly high overruling rate. Inappropriate disposition to lower levels of care did not change. ClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT00920491.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdrenomedullinAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsBiomarkersEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentVital SignsAdrenomedullinBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID26735540
PMCPMC4706260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.