Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26735408›Full record

ArticleNature medicine2016

Prospects for gene-engineered T cell immunotherapy for solid cancers.

Christopher A Klebanoff, Steven A Rosenberg, Nicholas P Restifo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 199 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
199citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
29.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

199 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 358 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Trends in immunotherapy for oral squamous cell carcinoma.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

139 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher A KlebanoffCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Steven A RosenbergCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Nicholas P RestifoCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
National Institutes of Health · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Adoptive Cell Transfer Immunotherapy of CancerZIABC010984 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ROSENBERG, STEVEN · 2009 to 2025
$56.8M
Gene therapy of cancerZIABC010985 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ROSENBERG, STEVEN · 2009 to 2025
$56.8M
Building on the success of the adoptive immunotherapy of cancerZIABC010763 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ROSENBERG, STEVEN · 2009 to 2020
$25.0M
Building on the success of the adoptive immunotherapy of cancerZ01BC010763 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI RESTIFO, NICHOLAS P · 2006 to 2008
$6.4M
Adoptive Cell Transfer Immunotherapy of CancerZ01BC010984 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ROSENBERG, STEVEN · 2008 to 2008
$1.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010763Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adoptive transfer of receptor-engineered T cells has produced impressive results in treating patients with B cell leukemias and lymphomas. This success has captured public imagination and driven academic and industrial researchers to develop similar 'off-the-shelf' receptors targeting shared antigens on epithelial cancers, the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. However, the successful treatment of large numbers of people with solid cancers using this strategy is unlikely to be straightforward. Receptor-engineered T cells have the potential to cause lethal toxicity from on-target recognition of normal tissues, and there is a paucity of truly tumor-specific antigens shared across tumor types. Here we offer our perspective on how expanding the use of genetically redirected T cells to treat the majority of patients with solid cancers will require major technical, manufacturing and regulatory innovations centered around the development of autologous gene therapies targeting private somatic mutations.

Indexed as

T-LymphocytesAdoptive TransferAntigens, NeoplasmGenetic EngineeringHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsReceptors, Antigen, T-CellAntigens, NeoplasmReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID26735408
PMCPMC6295670
OpenAlexW2232549736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.