ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2015
Bioceramics and Scaffolds: A Winning Combination for Tissue Engineering.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
99 citing papers in PubMed.
- Creating Unidirectionally Macrochanneled Zirconia Bone Scaffolds with Elongated Microporous Frameworks via Vat Photopolymerization Using Phase-Separable, Photocurable Vehicle.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Novel Chitosan-Modified PLA Doped n-HA Bone Scaffold.Artificial organs · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of β-TCP-Based Composite Biomaterials Using Chorionic Mesenchymal Stem Cells Under Non-Osteogenic Conditions.Polymers · 2026Article
- Advances and Challenges in Tissue Engineering: Biomaterials, Cellular Strategies, and Clinical Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Innovative prospects in 3D printed bio-scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering: A systematic review.World journal of methodology · 2026Article
- Development of Hydroxyapatite as a Bone Implant Biomaterial for Triggering Osteogenesis.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- In Vivo Study of Osseointegrable Bone Calcium Phosphate (CaP) Implants Coated with a Vanillin Derivative.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Adverse tissue reaction to a next-generation bioceramic sealer: a structured literature review and case report.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Review
- Three-Dimensional Printing of Calcium Phosphate-Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Modulating the crystallinity of biphasic calcium phosphate composites balances surface and ionic cues to enhance osteogenesis via integrin-mediated cytoskeletal signaling.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Possible Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications of Bioprinting for Bone Regeneration in Maxillofacial Surgery.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- In Vitro Osteogenic Stimulation of Human Adipose-Derived MSCs on Biofunctional 3D-Printed Scaffolds.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Evaluation of cartilage regeneration using a hybrid bilayer scaffold based on omentum: evidence of limited efficacy.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Advancing Scaffold Architecture for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Comparative Study of 3D-Printed β-TCP Constructs in Dynamic Culture with pBMSC.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Bioglasses Versus Bioactive Calcium Phosphate Derivatives as Advanced Ceramics in Tissue Engineering: Comparative and Comprehensive Study, Current Trends, and Innovative Solutions.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Living Porous Ceramics for Bacteria-Regulated Gas Sensing and Carbon Capture.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Polycaprolactone for Hard Tissue Regeneration: Scaffold Design and In Vivo Implications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- 3D-Printed Poly(ester urethane)/Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/Bioglass Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications.Polymers · 2024Article
- Advances in Bioceramics for Bone Regeneration: A Narrative Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Personalized bioceramic grafts for craniomaxillofacial bone regeneration.International journal of oral science · 2024Review
39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the last few decades, we have assisted to a general increase of elder population worldwide associated with age-related pathologies. Therefore, there is the need for new biomaterials that can substitute damaged tissues, stimulate the body's own regenerative mechanisms, and promote tissue healing. Porous templates referred to as "scaffolds" are thought to be required for three-dimensional tissue growth. Bioceramics, a special set of fully, partially, or non-crystalline ceramics (e.g., calcium phosphates, bioactive glasses, and glass-ceramics) that are designed for the repair and reconstruction of diseased parts of the body, have high potential as scaffold materials. Traditionally, bioceramics have been used to fill and restore bone and dental defects (repair of hard tissues). More recently, this category of biomaterials has also revealed promising applications in the field of soft-tissue engineering. Starting with an overview of the fundamental requirements for tissue engineering scaffolds, this article provides a detailed picture on recent developments of porous bioceramics and composites, including a summary of common fabrication technologies and a critical analysis of structure-property and structure-function relationships. Areas of future research are highlighted at the end of this review, with special attention to the development of multifunctional scaffolds exploiting therapeutic ion/drug release and emerging applications beyond hard tissue repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.