Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26734579›Full record

ArticleLiver cancer2015

Effectiveness of Sorafenib in Patients with Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) Refractory and Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Tadaaki Arizumi, Kazuomi Ueshima, Tomohiro Minami, Masashi Kono, Hirokazu Chishina, Masahiro Takita, Satoshi Kitai, Tatsuo Inoue, Norihisa Yada, Satoru Hagiwara and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 123 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 203 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tadaaki ArizumiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuomi UeshimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Tomohiro MinamiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Masashi KonoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hirokazu ChishinaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Masahiro TakitaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Satoshi KitaiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Tatsuo InoueDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Norihisa YadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Satoru HagiwaraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yasunori MinamiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Toshiharu SakuraiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Naoshi NishidaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Masatoshi KudoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Kindai University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPatients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) refractory to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) are considered to be candidates for sorafenib. The aim of this study was to evaluate the superiority of conversion of treatment to sorafenib on overall survival (OS) for cases refractory to TACE.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study carried out on 497 patients with HCC who were treated with TACE therapy at our hospital between January 2008 and December 2013. Fifty-six patients were diagnosed as refractory to TACE during their clinical course and they were divided into two cohorts, (1) those who switched from TACE to sorafenib and (2) those who continued TACE. The overall survival (OS) after the time of being refractory to TACE was evaluated between the two groups.

resultsAfter refractoriness to TACE therapy was confirmed, 24 patients continued with TACE (TACE-group) and 32 patients underwent treatment conversion to sorafenib (sorafenib-group). The median OS was 24.7 months in the sorafenib-group and 13.6 months in the TACE-group (p=0.002).

conclusionsConversion to sorafenib significantly improves the OS in patients refractory to TACE therapy with intermediate-stage HCC. Administration of sorafenib is therefore recommended in such circumstances of TACE treatment failure.

Indexed as

Child-Pugh scoreHepatocellular carcinomaOverall survivalSorafenibTransarterial chemoembolization

Identifiers

PMID26734579
PMCPMC4698649
OpenAlexW1930892342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.