ReviewFrontiers in oncology2015
Prediction of Cancer Drug Resistance and Implications for Personalized Medicine.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.
- Kinase Inhibitors for Targeted Cancer Therapy.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Pharmaceutical Humanities and Narrative Pharmacy: An Emerging New Concept in Pharmacy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Anti-Inflammatory and Cancer-Preventive Potential of Chamomile (Biomedicines · 2024Article
- DeepAEG: a model for predicting cancer drug response based on data enhancement and edge-collaborative update strategies.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Robust scoring of selective drug responses for patient-tailored therapy selection.Nature protocols · 2024Review
- Magnetic Resonance Image Radiomic Reproducibility: The Impact of Preprocessing on Extracted Features from Gross and High-Risk Clinical Tumor Volumes in Cervical Cancer Patients before Brachytherapy.Journal of medical signals and sensors · 2024Article
- Perspectives of Cell Sensitivity/Resistance Assay in Soft Tissue Sarcomas Chemotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- In Silico and In Vitro Identification of P-Glycoprotein Inhibitors from a Library of 375 Phytochemicals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Cytotoxicity of the methanol extracts and compounds of Brucea antidysenterica (Simaroubaceae) towards multifactorial drug-resistant human cancer cell lines.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2023Article
- Identification of Gedunin from a Phytochemical Depository as a Novel Multidrug Resistance-Bypassing Tubulin Inhibitor of Cancer Cells.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Drug Sensitivity Testing for Cancer Therapy, Key Areas.Reviews on recent clinical trials · 2022Article
- Anticancer drug resistance: An update and perspective.Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy · 2021Review
- Repurposing of the ALK Inhibitor Crizotinib for Acute Leukemia and Multiple Myeloma Cells.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Overcoming resistance to targeted therapy using MET inhibitors in solid cancers: evidence from preclinical and clinical studies.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2021Review
- Kinase drug discovery 20 years after imatinib: progress and future directions.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2021Review
- A microfluidic device enabling drug resistance analysis of leukemia cells via coupled dielectrophoretic detection and impedimetric counting.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Autologous culture method improves retention of tumors' native properties.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Exploring ovarian cancer cell resistance to rhenium anticancer complexes.Angewandte Chemie (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2020Article
- Exploring Ovarian Cancer Cell Resistance to Rhenium Anticancer Complexes.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2020Article
- Dietary Compound Isoliquiritigenin, an Antioxidant from Licorice, Suppresses Triple-Negative Breast Tumor Growth via Apoptotic Death Program Activation in Cell and Xenograft Animal Models.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug resistance still impedes successful cancer chemotherapy. A major goal of early concepts in individualized therapy was to develop in vitro tests to predict tumors' drug responsiveness. We have developed an in vitro short-term test based on nucleic acid precursor incorporation to determine clinical drug resistance. This test detects inherent and acquired resistance in vitro and transplantable syngeneic and xenografted tumors in vivo. In several clinical trials, clinical resistance was predictable with more than 90% accuracy, while drug sensitivity was detected with less accuracy (~60%). Remarkably, clinical cross-resistance to numerous drugs (multidrug resistance, broad spectrum resistance) was detectable by a single compound, doxorubicin, due to its multifactorial modes of action. The results of this predictive test were in good agreement with predictive assays of other authors. As no predictive test has been established as yet for clinical diagnostics, the identification of sensitive drugs may not reach sufficiently high reliability for clinical routine. A meta-analysis of the literature published during the past four decades considering test results of more than 15,000 tumor patients unambiguously demonstrated that, in the majority of studies, resistance was correctly predicted with an accuracy between 80 and 100%, while drug sensitivity could only be predicted with an accuracy of 50-80%. This synopsis of the published literature impressively illustrates that prediction of drug resistance could be validated. The determination of drug resistance was reliable independent of tumor type, test assay, and drug used in these in vitro tests. By contrast, chemosensitivity could not be predicted with high reliability. Therefore, we propose a rethinking of the "chemosensitivity" concept. Instead, predictive in vitro tests may reliably identify drug-resistant tumors. The clinical consequence imply to subject resistant tumors not to chemotherapy, but to other new treatment options, such as antibody therapy, adoptive immune therapy, hyperthermia, gene therapy, etc. The high accuracy to predict resistant tumors may be exploited to develop new strategies for individualized cancer therapy. This new concept bears the potential of a revival of predictive tests for personalized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.