Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26734068›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2016

Intraoperative diagnosis of solitary cecal diverticulum not requiring surgery: is appendectomy indicated?

Renol M Koshy, Abdelrahman Abusabeib, Saif Al-Mudares, Mohamed Khairat, Adriana Toro, Isidoro Di Carlo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Caecal diverticulitis can be misdiagnosed as acute appendicitis: a systematic review of the literature.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Right sided diverticulitis in western countries: A review.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Renol M KoshyDepartment of General Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, 3050 Doha, Qatar.
Abdelrahman AbusabeibDepartment of General Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, 3050 Doha, Qatar.
Saif Al-MudaresDepartment of General Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, 3050 Doha, Qatar.
Mohamed KhairatDepartment of General Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, 3050 Doha, Qatar.
Adriana ToroDepartment of Surgery, Patti Hospital, Patti (ME), Italy.
Isidoro Di CarloDepartment of General Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, 3050 Doha, Qatar ; Department of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, "G.F. Ingrassia" University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo compare experience with solitary cecal diverticulum (SCD) with literature on the indication for appendectomy in cases of solitary cecal diverticulitis.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed all cases of SCD in our institution from September 2011 to March 2013. Data on sex, age, ethnic origin, presence of pain in the right iliac fossa, duration of symptoms, diagnosis, management, intraoperative findings, histologic examination, hospital stay, complications, and follow-up were reviewed and analyzed. We compared this to related literature reported between 2000 and 2015.

resultsIn the study period, 10 patients presented with an SCD. Male sex and Asian origin were predominant. All patients had pain in the right iliac fossa, with a duration of 2-5 days. In nine cases the diagnosis was made by clinical examination and laboratory testing. One patient who had undergone a previous appendectomy was diagnosed with SCD by computed tomography. This last patient was treated conservatively, four patients were treated with resection of the cecum "en bloc" with the last jejunal loop and appendix, and the other five patients were treated with appendectomies. Two patients had minor complications. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 to a maximum of 24 months. No recurrence was recorded in either the case treated conservatively or the cases treated by appendectomies.

conclusionsIn cases of operative but conservative treatment for SCD, appendectomy could be justified to avoid misdiagnosis in case of future episodes of solitary cecal diverticulitis.

Indexed as

AppendectomyCecumDiverticulumSolitary

Identifiers

PMID26734068
PMCPMC4700755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.