Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26733981›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2015

Differential Response of Acidobacteria Subgroups to Forest-to-Pasture Conversion and Their Biogeographic Patterns in the Western Brazilian Amazon.

Acacio A Navarrete, Andressa M Venturini, Kyle M Meyer, Ann M Klein, James M Tiedje, Brendan J M Bohannan, Klaus Nüsslein, Siu M Tsai, Jorge L M Rodrigues

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Different microbial communities in paddy soils under organic and nonorganic farming.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Reforestation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Acacio A NavarreteCell and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Center for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, University of São Paulo Piracicaba, Brazil.
Andressa M VenturiniCell and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Center for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, University of São Paulo Piracicaba, Brazil.
Kyle M MeyerDepartment of Biology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon Eugene, OR, USA.
Ann M KleinDepartment of Biology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon Eugene, OR, USA.
James M TiedjeDepartment of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Center for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University East Lansing, MI, USA.
Brendan J M BohannanDepartment of Biology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon Eugene, OR, USA.
Klaus NüssleinDepartment of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA, USA.
Siu M TsaiCell and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Center for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, University of São Paulo Piracicaba, Brazil.
Jorge L M RodriguesDepartment of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis Davis, CA, USA.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Oregon · USMichigan State University · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Members of the phylum Acidobacteria are among the most abundant soil bacteria on Earth, but little is known about their response to environmental changes. We asked how the relative abundance and biogeographic patterning of this phylum and its subgroups responded to forest-to-pasture conversion in soils of the western Brazilian Amazon. Pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes was employed to assess the abundance and composition of the Acidobacteria community across 54 soil samples taken using a spatially nested sampling scheme at the landscape level. Numerically, Acidobacteria represented 20% of the total bacterial community in forest soils and 11% in pasture soils. Overall, 15 different Acidobacteria subgroups of the current 26 subgroups were detected, with Acidobacteria subgroups 1, 3, 5, and 6 accounting together for 87% of the total Acidobacteria community in forest soils and 75% in pasture soils. Concomitant with changes in soil chemistry after forest-to-pasture conversion-particularly an increase in properties linked to soil acidity and nutrient availability-we observed an increase in the relative abundances of Acidobacteria subgroups 4, 10, 17, and 18, and a decrease in the relative abundances of other Acidobacteria subgroups in pasture relative to forest soils. The composition of the total Acidobacteria community as well as the most abundant Acidobacteria subgroups (1, 3, 5, and 6) was significantly more similar in composition across space in pasture soils than in forest soils. These results suggest that preponderant responses of Acidobacteria subgroups, especially subgroups 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6, to forest-to-pasture conversion effects in soils could be used to define management-indicators of agricultural practices in the Amazon Basin. These acidobacterial responses are at least in part through alterations on acidity- and nutrient-related properties of the Amazon soils.

Indexed as

16S rRNA geneAcidobacteriacommunity similarityland-use changespatial scaletropical rainforest

Identifiers

PMID26733981
PMCPMC4686610
OpenAlexW2268654084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.