ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2015
Sulfur Isotope Effects of Dissimilatory Sulfite Reductase.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Abundance-activity decoupling in sulfur-cycling bacteria reflects viral infection types in meromictic lakes.The ISME journal · 2026Article
- Molecular insights into the dynamic relationship between respiration rate and sulfur isotope effect.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Exploring Energy Conservation in Sulphate-Dependent Anaerobic Methane-Oxidising Consortia Through Metabolic Modelling.Environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Genome-resolved transcriptomics reveals novel PCE-dehalogenating bacteria from Aarhus Bay sediments.mSystems · 2025Article
- Co-evolution of early Earth environments and microbial life.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024Review
- What Controls the Sulfur Isotope Fractionation during Dissimilatory Sulfate Reduction?ACS environmental Au · 2023Review
- Metagenomic and metatranscriptomic insights into sulfate-reducing bacteria in a revegetated acidic mine wasteland.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2022Article
- Physiological, genomic, and sulfur isotopic characterization of methanol metabolism by Desulfovibrio carbinolicus.PloS one · 2021Article
- Adenosine-5'-Phosphosulfate- and Sulfite Reductases Activities of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria from Various Environments.Biomolecules · 2020Article
- Phylogenomic analysis of novel Diaforarchaea is consistent with sulfite but not sulfate reduction in volcanic environments on early Earth.The ISME journal · 2020Article
- Isotopic Fractionation Associated With Sulfate Import and Activation byFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Role of APS reductase in biogeochemical sulfur isotope fractionation.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Proteomic and Isotopic Response ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- The Biogeochemical Sulfur Cycle of Marine Sediments.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Review
- Expanded diversity of microbial groups that shape the dissimilatory sulfur cycle.The ISME journal · 2018Article
- Electron carriers in microbial sulfate reduction inferred from experimental and environmental sulfur isotope fractionations.The ISME journal · 2018Article
- Deconstructing the Dissimilatory Sulfate Reduction Pathway: Isotope Fractionation of a Mutant Unable of Growth on Sulfate.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Isotopic Fractionation of Sulfur in Carbonyl Sulfide by Carbonyl Sulfide Hydrolase of Thiobacillus thioparus THI115.Microbes and environments · 2017Article
- Influence of Phosphorus and Cell Geometry on the Fractionation of Sulfur Isotopes by Several Species ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The precise interpretation of environmental sulfur isotope records requires a quantitative understanding of the biochemical controls on sulfur isotope fractionation by the principle isotope-fractionating process within the S cycle, microbial sulfate reduction (MSR). Here we provide the only direct observation of the major ((34)S/(32)S) and minor ((33)S/(32)S, (36)S/(32)S) sulfur isotope fractionations imparted by a central enzyme in the energy metabolism of sulfate reducers, dissimilatory sulfite reductase (DsrAB). Results from in vitro sulfite reduction experiments allow us to calculate the in vitro DsrAB isotope effect in (34)S/(32)S (hereafter, [Formula: see text]) to be 15.3 ± 2‰, 2σ. The accompanying minor isotope effect in (33)S, described as [Formula: see text], is calculated to be 0.5150 ± 0.0012, 2σ. These observations facilitate a rigorous evaluation of the isotopic fractionation associated with the dissimilatory MSR pathway, as well as of the environmental variables that govern the overall magnitude of fractionation by natural communities of sulfate reducers. The isotope effect induced by DsrAB upon sulfite reduction is a factor of 0.3-0.6 times prior indirect estimates, which have ranged from 25 to 53‰ in (34)εDsrAB. The minor isotope fractionation observed from DsrAB is consistent with a kinetic or equilibrium effect. Our in vitro constraints on the magnitude of [Formula: see text] is similar to the median value of experimental observations compiled from all known published work, where (34)ε r-p = 16.1‰ (r-p indicates reactant vs. product, n = 648). This value closely matches those of MSR operating at high sulfate reduction rates in both laboratory chemostat experiments ([Formula: see text] 17.3 ± 1.5‰, 2σ) and in modern marine sediments ([Formula: see text] 17.3 ± 3.8‰). Targeting the direct isotopic consequences of a specific enzymatic processes is a fundamental step toward a biochemical foundation for reinterpreting the biogeochemical and geobiological sulfur isotope records in modern and ancient environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.