Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26733819›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2015

Optogenetic Stimulation of Lateral Amygdala Input to Posterior Piriform Cortex Modulates Single-Unit and Ensemble Odor Processing.

Benjamin Sadrian, Donald A Wilson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Threat Memory in the Sensory Cortex: Insights from Olfaction.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Glutamatergic Neurons in the Piriform Cortex Influence the Activity of D1- and D2-Type Receptor-Expressing Olfactory Tubercle Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Amygdalar Gating of Early Sensory Processing through Interactions with Locus Coeruleus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Development of Odor Hedonics: Experience-Dependent Ontogeny of Circuits Supporting Maternal and Predator Odor Responses in Rats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin SadrianDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New YorkNY, USA; The Emotional Brain Institute, The Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, OrangeburgNY, USA.
Donald A WilsonDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New YorkNY, USA; The Emotional Brain Institute, The Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, OrangeburgNY, USA.
Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research · USNYU Langone Health · US

Funding

CORTICAL PROCESSING OF OLFACTORY STIMULIR01DC003906 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA NORMAN · PI WILSON, DONALD A · 1999 to 2017
$4.2M
Research Training in Translational Developmental NeuroscienceT32MH067763 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CASTELLANOS, FRANCISCO XAVIER · 2003 to 2013
$2.9M
Ontogeny of Olfactory Hedonic EncodingR01DC009910 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SULLIVAN, REGINA MARIE · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003906NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC003906NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009910NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC009910NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH067763NIMH NIH HHS T32-MH067763
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olfactory information is synthesized within the olfactory cortex to provide not only an odor percept, but also a contextual significance that supports appropriate behavioral response to specific odor cues. The piriform cortex serves as a communication hub within this circuit by sharing reciprocal connectivity with higher processing regions, such as the lateral entorhinal cortex and amygdala. The functional significance of these descending inputs on piriform cortical processing of odorants is currently not well understood. We have employed optogenetic methods to selectively stimulate lateral and basolateral amygdala (BLA) afferent fibers innervating the posterior piriform cortex (pPCX) to quantify BLA modulation of pPCX odor-evoked activity. Single unit odor-evoked activity of anesthetized BLA-infected animals was significantly modulated compared with control animal recordings, with individual cells displaying either enhancement or suppression of odor-driven spiking. In addition, BLA activation induced a decorrelation of odor-evoked pPCX ensemble activity relative to odor alone. Together these results indicate a modulatory role in pPCX odor processing for the BLA complex. This interaction could contribute to learned changes in PCX activity following associative conditioning, as well as support alternate patterns of odor processing that are state-dependent.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAfferent PathwaysAnimalsBasolateral Nuclear ComplexDependovirusFemaleGenetic VectorsMaleMice, Inbred C57BLOdorantsOlfactory PerceptionOptogeneticsPhysical StimulationPiriform Cortexbasolateral amygdalachannelrhodopsinfear conditioningodor codingoptogeneticspiriform cortextop–down processing

Identifiers

PMID26733819
PMCPMC4685079
OpenAlexW2243452807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.