Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26733763›Full record

ReviewJournal of inflammation (London, England)2016

CXCL14 as an emerging immune and inflammatory modulator.

Jing Lu, Mita Chatterjee, Hannes Schmid, Sandra Beck, Meinrad Gawaz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of inflammation (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 142 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
142citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

142 citing papers in PubMed, 237 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Advances in Adipose Tissue Biology.Endocrine reviews · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jing LuMedizinische Klinik III, Kardiologie und Kreislauferkrankungen, Universität Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Strasse 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Mita ChatterjeeMedizinische Klinik III, Kardiologie und Kreislauferkrankungen, Universität Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Strasse 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Hannes SchmidMedizinische Klinik III, Kardiologie und Kreislauferkrankungen, Universität Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Strasse 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Sandra BeckMedizinische Klinik III, Kardiologie und Kreislauferkrankungen, Universität Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Strasse 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Meinrad GawazMedizinische Klinik III, Kardiologie und Kreislauferkrankungen, Universität Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Strasse 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CXCL14, a relatively novel chemokine, is a non-ELR (glutamic acid-leucine-arginine) chemokine with a broad spectrum of biological activities. CXCL14 mainly contributes to the regulation of immune cell migration, also executes antimicrobial immunity. The identity of the receptor for CXCL14 still remains obscure and therefore the intracellular signaling pathway is not entirely delineated. The present review summarizes the contribution of CXCL14 in these two aspects and discusses the biological mechanisms regulating CXCL14 expression and potential CXCL14 mediated functional implications in a variety of cells.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial activityCXCL14InfectionInflammationMigration

Identifiers

PMID26733763
PMCPMC4700668
OpenAlexW2227781744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.