Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26733446›Full record

ArticleBrain research bulletin2016

Assessment of individual differences in the rat nucleus accumbens transcriptome following taste-heroin extended access.

Caesar G Imperio, Ashley J McFalls, Elizabeth M Colechio, Dustin R Masser, Kent E Vrana, Patricia S Grigson, Willard M Freeman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research bulletin, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caesar G ImperioDepartment of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
Ashley J McFallsDepartment of Pharmacology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States.
Elizabeth M ColechioDepartment of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
Dustin R MasserDepartment of Physiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States; Reynolds Oklahoma Center on Aging, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States.
Kent E VranaDepartment of Pharmacology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States.
Patricia S GrigsonDepartment of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
Willard M FreemanDepartment of Physiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States; Reynolds Oklahoma Center on Aging, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States. Electronic address: wfreeman@ouhsc.edu.
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

Targeted DNA Methylation and Mitochondrial Heteroplasmy CoreP30AG050911 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI Veronica Galvan, Benjamin Francis Miller · 2015 to 2026
$13.9M
Substance abuse: Individual differences in behavior and epigeneticsF31DA036322 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI IMPERIO, CAESAR G · 2013 to 2014
$74k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG050911NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA036322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heroin addiction is a disease of chronic relapse that harms the individual through devaluation of personal responsibilities in favor of finding and using drugs. Only some recreational heroin users devolve into addiction but the basis of these individual differences is not known. We have shown in rats that avoidance of a heroin-paired taste cue reliably identifies individual animals with greater addiction-like behavior for heroin. Here rats received 5min access to a 0.15% saccharin solution followed by the opportunity to self-administer either saline or heroin for 6h. Large Suppressors of the heroin-paired taste cue displayed increased drug escalation, motivation for drug, and drug loading behavior compared with Small Suppressors. Little is known about the molecular mechanisms of these individual differences in addiction-like behavior. We examined the individual differences in mRNA expression in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) of rats that were behaviorally stratified by addiction-like behavior using next-generation sequencing. We hypothesized that based on the avoidance of the drug-paired cue there will be a unique mRNA profile in the NAc. Analysis of strand-specific whole genome RNA-Seq data revealed a number of genes differentially regulated in NAc based on the suppression of the natural saccharine reward. Large Suppressors exhibited a unique mRNA prolife compared to Saline controls and Small Suppressors. Genes related to immunity, neuronal activity, and behavior were differentially expressed among the 3 groups. In total, individual differences in avoidance of a heroin-paired taste cue are associated with addiction-like behavior along with differential NAc gene expression.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainConditioning, OperantCuesHeroinHeroin DependenceIndividualityMaleNucleus AccumbensRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRewardSaccharinSelf AdministrationTasteTaste PerceptionHeroinSaccharinHeroinRewardRNA-SeqTranscription

Identifiers

PMID26733446
PMCPMC4893904
OpenAlexW2215438033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.