ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2016
Intraoperative factors affecting conversion from cruciate retaining to cruciate substituting in total knee arthroplasty.
Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- An intraoperative load sensor did not improve the early postoperative results of posterior-stabilized TKA for osteoarthritis with varus deformities.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019Trial
- Long-term outcomes of single-radius total knee arthroplasty in an Asian population: a comparison of cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized designs.Knee surgery & related research · 2026Article
- Perioperative safety and accuracy of CT-based fully active burr-based robotic total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Observational
- Proximal Tibial Resection Alone Leads to a Significant Increase in Flexion Gap Size in Tibia-First Robotic-Assisted Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2026Observational
- Radiological measurement of posterior tibial subluxation as a preoperative factor in choosing the type of implant in primary total knee arthroplasty.Reumatologia · 2024Article
- Review
- Modern Total Knee Arthroplasty Bearing Designs and the Role of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament.Arthroplasty today · 2023Article
- Preoperative Factors Predicting the Preservation of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament in Total Knee Arthroplasty.Orthopaedic surgery · 2022Article
- Single-stage total knee arthroplasty and femoral osteotomy for osteoarthritis with severe supracondylar deformity.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2021Article
- What to Know for Selecting Cruciate-Retaining or Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2019Review
- Mid-term survivorship of cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty using modular mini-keel tibial implants.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to analyse the factors affecting the conversion from posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-retaining (CR) to PCL-substituting (PS) prostheses during total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
methodsA total of 920 TKAs, which had been preoperatively planned to undergo implantation of CR-type prostheses, were reviewed retrospectively. Of these, 83 knees (9.0 %) were converted intraoperatively to PS prostheses. The clinical and radiological factors of the non-converted (CR) and converted (PS) groups were compared. Clinically, age, gender, body mass index, angle of flexion contracture, size of the femoral component, and thickness of the polyethylene insert were compared between the CR and PS groups. Radiologically, the severity of the varus deformity and the posterior tibial slope angle (PSA) were compared between the CR and PS groups.
resultsNo significant differences in age, gender, body mass index, range of motion, thickness of the polyethylene insert, or severity of varus deformity were identified. The average preoperative angle of flexion contracture was 5.9° ± 7.4° in the CR group and 8.1° ± 9.1° in the PS group (p = 0.002). The average preoperative PSA was 9.6° ± 4.0° in the CR group and 11.0° ± 5.0° in the PS group (p = 0.018). The conversion rates to a PS-type femoral component of size C, D, and E were 13.1, 7.0, and 6.3 %, respectively (p = 0.004).
conclusionThe conversion rate from CR- to PS-type prostheses was high in patients with severe flexion contracture, steep posterior slope, and a small femoral component size. These factors should be carefully considered for appropriate selection of prosthesis type. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.