Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26732875›Full record

ArticleMycorrhiza2016

Proteomic and morphometric study of the in vitro interaction between Oncidium sphacelatum Lindl. (Orchidaceae) and Thanatephorus sp. RG26 (Ceratobasidiaceae).

Mariana Yadira López-Chávez, Karina Guillén-Navarro, Vincenzo Bertolini, Sergio Encarnación, Magdalena Hernández-Ortiz, Irene Sánchez-Moreno, Anne Damon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycorrhiza, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Functional Insights into the Roles of Hormones in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mariana Yadira López-ChávezEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Carretera Antiguo Aeropuerto Km 2.5, C.P. 30700, Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
Karina Guillén-NavarroEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Carretera Antiguo Aeropuerto Km 2.5, C.P. 30700, Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico. kguillen@ecosur.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5199-1156
Vincenzo BertoliniEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Carretera Antiguo Aeropuerto Km 2.5, C.P. 30700, Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
Sergio EncarnaciónCentro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad s/n, Col. Chamilpa, C.P. 62210, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Magdalena Hernández-OrtizCentro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad s/n, Col. Chamilpa, C.P. 62210, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Irene Sánchez-MorenoEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Carretera Panamericana y Periférico Sur s/n, Barrio de María Auxiliadora, C.P. 29290, San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico.
Anne DamonEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Carretera Antiguo Aeropuerto Km 2.5, C.P. 30700, Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
El Colegio de la Frontera Sur · MXUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orchidaceae establish symbiotic relationships with fungi in the Rhizoctonia group, resulting in interactions beneficial to both organisms or in cell destruction in one of them (pathogenicity). Previous studies have focused mostly on terrestrial species with a few, preliminary studies, on epiphytes. To further our understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in these symbioses, we evaluated the interaction between Oncidium sphacelatum Lindl. and the mycorrhizal fungus Thanatephorus sp. strain RG26 (isolated from a different orchid species) in vitro using morphometric and proteomic analyses. Evidence from the morphometric and microscopic analysis showed that the fungus promoted linear growth and differentiation of orchid protocorms during 98 days interaction. On day 63, protocorm development was evident, so we analyzed the physiological response of both organisms at that moment. Proteome results suggest that orchid development stimulated by the fungus apparently involves cell cycle proteins, purine recycling, ribosome biogenesis, energy metabolism, and secretion that were up-regulated in the orchid; whereas in the fungus, a high expression of proteins implicated in stress response, protein-protein interaction, and saccharides and protein biosynthesis were found in the symbiotic interaction. This is the first work reporting proteins differentially expressed in the epiphytic orchid-fungus interaction and will contribute to the search for molecular markers that will facilitate the study of this symbiosis in both wild orchids and those in danger of extinction.

Indexed as

BasidiomycotaBiomarkersGene Expression Regulation, FungalGene Expression Regulation, PlantOrchidaceaePhylogenyProteomicsSymbiosisBiomarkersCeratobasidiumOrchid mycorrhizaProtocormRhizoctoniaSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID26732875
OpenAlexW2228928112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.