ArticleFrontiers in psychology2015
Examining the Dynamic Structure of Daily Internalizing and Externalizing Behavior at Multiple Levels of Analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Working memory and daily internalizing problems: Pubertal timing moderates adult relations.Journal of affective disorders · 2026Article
- Dense Phenotyping of Human Brain Network Organization Using Precision fMRI.Annual review of psychology · 2026Review
- Modeling qualitative between-person heterogeneity in time series using latent class vector autoregressive models.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Understanding the Within- and Between-Person Structure of Daily Psychopathology Among Adolescents and Young Adults.Assessment · 2025Article
- An exploratory study on disinhibition and interpersonal outcomes in daily life.Personality disorders · 2025Article
- Article
- Emotion Dysregulation in College Students: Contributions of Maladaptive Personality Traits and Momentary Affect.Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment · 2025Article
- Person-specific dynamics between negative emotions and suicidal thoughts.Comprehensive psychiatry · 2024Article
- Power analysis for idiographic (within-subject) clinical trials: Implications for treatments of rare conditions and precision medicine.Behavior research methods · 2023Article
- Insights from personalized models of brain and behavior for identifying biomarkers in psychiatry.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2023Review
- Factor analysis in personality disorders research: Modern issues and illustrations of practical recommendations.Personality disorders · 2023Review
- Identifying person-specific coping responses to suicidal urges: A case series analysis and illustration of the idiographic method.Suicide & life-threatening behavior · 2022Article
- A five-factor model of perseverative thought.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2022Article
- Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): III. Emotional dysfunction superspectrum.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2022Article
- Path and Directionality Discovery in Individual Dynamic Models: A Regularized Unified Structural Equation Modeling Approach for Hybrid Vector Autoregression.Psychometrika · 2021Article
- The distribution of daily affect distinguishes internalizing and externalizing spectra and subfactors.Journal of abnormal psychology · 2021Article
- Symptoms as rapidly fluctuating over time: Revealing the close psychological interconnections among borderline personality disorder symptoms via within-person structures.Journal of abnormal psychology · 2021Article
- Personalized models of personality disorders: using a temporal network method to understand symptomatology and daily functioning in a clinical sample.Psychological medicine · 2020Article
- Personalized models of psychopathology as contextualized dynamic processes: An example from individuals with borderline personality disorder.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2020Article
- Assessing within- and between-family variations in an expanded measure of childhood adversity.Psychological assessment · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Psychiatric diagnostic covariation suggests that the underlying structure of psychopathology is not one of circumscribed disorders. Quantitative modeling of individual differences in diagnostic patterns has uncovered several broad domains of mental disorder liability, of which the Internalizing and Externalizing spectra have garnered the greatest support. These dimensions have generally been estimated from lifetime or past-year comorbidity patters, which are distal from the covariation of symptoms and maladaptive behavior that ebb and flow in daily life. In this study, structural models are applied to daily diary data (Median = 94 days) of maladaptive behaviors collected from a sample (N = 101) of individuals diagnosed with personality disorders (PDs). Using multilevel and unified structural equation modeling, between-person, within-person, and person-specific structures were estimated from 16 behaviors that are encompassed by the Internalizing and Externalizing spectra. At the between-person level (i.e., individual differences in average endorsement across days) we found support for a two-factor Internalizing-Externalizing model, which exhibits significant associations with corresponding diagnostic spectra. At the within-person level (i.e., dynamic covariation among daily behavior pooled across individuals) we found support for a more differentiated, four-factor, Negative Affect-Detachment-Hostility-Disinhibition structure. Finally, we demonstrate that the person-specific structures of associations between these four domains are highly idiosyncratic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.