ReviewMolecular syndromology2015
Mechanisms of Origin, Phenotypic Effects and Diagnostic Implications of Complex Chromosome Rearrangements.
Review in Molecular syndromology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.
- Kabuki Syndrome and Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Co-Occurrence: Unique Case with Novel Variant.Molecular syndromology · 2025Article
- Genetic and functional characterization of inherited complex chromosomal rearrangements in a family with multisystem anomalies.Genetics in medicine open · 2025Article
- Article
- Complex balanced intrachromosomal rearrangement involving PITX2 identified as a cause of Axenfeld-Rieger Syndrome.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2024Article
- A cohort study of neurodevelopmental disorders and/or congenital anomalies using high resolution chromosomal microarrays in southern Brazil highlighting the significance of ASD.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Monitoring Genomic Structural Rearrangements Resulting from Gene Editing.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Methods of Detection and Mechanisms of Origin of Complex Structural Genome Variations.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Review
- Diversity of Clinical and Molecular Characteristics in Korean Patients with 16p11.2 Microdeletion Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Shifting the Focus ofMolecular syndromology · 2023Article
- Large-scale detection and characterization of interchromosomal rearrangements in normozoospermic bulls using massive genotype and phenotype data sets.Genome research · 2023Article
- Overlapping Interstitial Deletions of the Region 9q22.33 to 9q33.3 of Three Patients Allow Pinpointing Candidate Genes for Epilepsy and Cleft Lip and Palate.Molecular syndromology · 2023Article
- Chromoanagenesis in the asy1 meiotic mutant of Arabidopsis.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Expanded Phenotypic Spectrum or Multiple Syndromes?Molecular syndromology · 2022Article
- Cytogenomic Characterization of a Novel de novo Balanced Reciprocal Translocation t(1;12) by Genome Sequencing Leading to Fusion Gene Formation ofMolecular syndromology · 2022Article
- Long-read Oxford nanopore sequencing reveals a de novo case of complex chromosomal rearrangement involving chromosomes 2, 7, and 13.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2022Article
- A case of complex balanced chromosomal translocations associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.Molecular cytogenetics · 2022Article
- Complex Chromosomal Rearrangement Causes Male Azoospermia: A Case Report and Literature Review.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Balanced at First Sight, but in Reality out of Balance.Molecular syndromology · 2021Article
- Systems approaches identify the consequences of monosomy in somatic human cells.Nature communications · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complex chromosome rearrangements (CCRs) are currently defined as structural genome variations that involve more than 2 chromosome breaks and result in exchanges of chromosomal segments. They are thought to be extremely rare, but their detection rate is rising because of improvements in molecular cytogenetic technology. Their population frequency is also underestimated, since many CCRs may not elicit a phenotypic effect. CCRs may be the result of fork stalling and template switching, microhomology-mediated break-induced repair, breakage-fusion-bridge cycles, or chromothripsis. Patients with chromosomal instability syndromes show elevated rates of CCRs due to impaired DNA double-strand break responses during meiosis. Therefore, the putative functions of the proteins encoded by ATM, BLM, WRN, ATR, MRE11, NBS1, and RAD51 in preventing CCRs are discussed. CCRs may exert a pathogenic effect by either (1) gene dosage-dependent mechanisms, e.g. haploinsufficiency, (2) mechanisms based on disruption of the genomic architecture, such that genes, parts of genes or regulatory elements are truncated, fused or relocated and thus their interactions disturbed - these mechanisms will predominantly affect gene expression - or (3) mixed mutation mechanisms in which a CCR on one chromosome is combined with a different type of mutation on the other chromosome. Such inferred mechanisms of pathogenicity need corroboration by mRNA sequencing. Also, future studies with in vitro models, such as inducible pluripotent stem cells from patients with CCRs, and transgenic model organisms should substantiate current inferences regarding putative pathogenic effects of CCRs. The ramifications of the growing body of information on CCRs for clinical and experimental genetics and future treatment modalities are briefly illustrated with 2 cases, one of which suggests KDM4C (JMJD2C) as a novel candidate gene for mental retardation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.