ArticleObesity surgery2016
Minimal Invasive Internal Liver Retractor in Conventional and Trans-umbilical Single-Incision Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Video Report.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel liver retraction method in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Article
- Needlescopic sleeve gastrectomy: pushing the boundaries of the standard technique.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a safe and efficient procedure with comparable results between conventional and single-incision approach in selected patients. However, the critical point in both approaches is the retraction of the hypertrophic and fatty left lobe of the liver which increases technical difficulties and limit the exposure of the hiatus. Traditional liver retractors require an additional sub-xiphoid incision for insertion and cause post-operative pain as well as iatrogenic liver injuries. Various techniques have been described to allow adequate liver retraction through smaller incisions or fewer ports without compromising patient safety. However, some disadvantages of these methods are the need for incision of the liver ligament or diaphragmatic crura puncture rendering the device difficult to reposition. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwo morbidly obese patients underwent a SG by conventional laparoscopy and by trans-umbilical single-incision using a novel minimal invasive internal liver retractor: the Versa Lifter Band®.
resultsThis soft and flexible internal retractor was fully repositionable and adjustable intraoperatively. The time required to complete the liver retraction was 4 min 12 s in conventional surgery and 5 min 23 s in single-incision approach. Liver retraction was always satisfying resulting in limited intra-operative difficulties without the need of additional retractors/ports or conversion in both patients. No adverse outcomes occurred during the intra and post-operative periods without rise in aspartate aminotransferase and alanine-aminotransferase serum levels.
conclusionIn our preliminary experience, this internal liver retractor was easy to handle and provided an effective and safe retraction with good exposure of the surgical field and improved ergonomy in single incision as well as reduced port laparoscopic SG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.