ArticleScientific reports2016
Evaluation of hypointense liver lesions during hepatobiliary phase MR imaging in normal and cirrhotic livers: is increasing flip angle reliable?
Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A State-of-the-Art Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Optimized visualization of focal liver lesions and vascular structures in real-time T1-weighted gradient echo sequences for magnetic resonance-guided liver procedures.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2023Article
- Transient severe motion during arterial phase in patients with Gadoxetic acid administration: Can a five hepatic arterial subphases technique mitigate the artifact?Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gd-EOB-DTPA is a newly developed liver specific magnetic resonance contrast agent, which is widely used for focal liver lesion (FLL) detection and liver function evaluation. However, it has been demonstrated that hepatocytes uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA obviously decreased in cirrhotic liver, and cirrhotic liver parenchyma may show reduced enhancement in hepatobiliary phase, which would result in decreased liver-to-lesion contrast (LLC) and liver to lesion signal intensity ratio (LLSIR). Therefore, it is important to improve the image quality in cirrhotic liver, as it may alter therapeutic strategy. In this paper, we have shown adjustments of the flip angle (FA) provides a simple step to achieve better image quality for evaluation of FLLs, especially to those patients with severe liver cirrhosis. On the basis of our quantitative analysis, both of the LLC and the LLSIR with high FA protocol were always higher than those of low FA protocol. Additionally, on high FA images, more FLLs were detected, peritumoral invasion was found, boundary of the tumor was more remarkably, and better visualization of bile duct was observed. In conclusion, for the patient with severe liver cirrhosis, increasing FA can obviously improve the image quality, which is helpful for FLLs depiction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.