Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26732236›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2015

An Ultra-High Field Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Study of Post Exercise Lactate, Glutamate and Glutamine Change in the Human Brain.

Andrea Dennis, Adam G Thomas, Nancy B Rawlings, Jamie Near, Thomas E Nichols, Stuart Clare, Heidi Johansen-Berg, Charlotte J Stagg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Increased brainBiology of sport · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Characterization of theJournal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Determination of acrolein-associated TApplied magnetic resonance · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Increases in BrainFrontiers in physiology · 2017
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrea DennisOxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford Oxford, UK.
Adam G ThomasOxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of OxfordOxford, UK; Section on Functional Imaging Methods, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human ServicesBethesda, MD, USA.
Nancy B RawlingsOxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford Oxford, UK.
Jamie NearOxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of OxfordOxford, UK; Douglas Mental Health University Institute and Department of Psychiatry, McGill UniversityMontreal, QC, Canada.
Thomas E NicholsOxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of OxfordOxford, UK; Department of Statistics and Warwick Manufacturing Group, University of WarwickCoventry, UK.
Stuart ClareOxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford Oxford, UK.
Heidi Johansen-BergOxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford Oxford, UK.
Charlotte J StaggOxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of OxfordOxford, UK; Physiological Neuroimaging Group, Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity (OHBA), University of OxfordOxford, UK.
University of Oxford · GBWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700399Wellcome Trust 090955Wellcome Trust 102584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During strenuous exercise there is a progressive increase in lactate uptake and metabolism into the brain as workload and plasma lactate levels increase. Although it is now widely accepted that the brain can metabolize lactate, few studies have directly measured brain lactate following vigorous exercise. Here, we used ultra-high field magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the brain to obtain static measures of brain lactate, as well as brain glutamate and glutamine after vigorous exercise. The aims of our experiment were to (a) track the changes in brain lactate following recovery from exercise, and (b) to simultaneously measure the signals from brain glutamate and glutamine. The results of our experiment showed that vigorous exercise resulted in a significant increase in brain lactate. Furthermore, both glutamate and glutamine were successfully resolved, and as expected, although contrary to some previous reports, we did not observe any significant change in either amino acid after exercise. We did however observe a negative correlation between glutamate and a measure of fitness. These results support the hypothesis that peripherally derived lactate is taken up by the brain when available. Our data additionally highlight the potential of ultra-high field MRS as a non-invasive way of measuring multiple brain metabolite changes with exercise.

Indexed as

brainexerciseglutamatelactatemagnetic resonance spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID26732236
PMCPMC4681779
OpenAlexW2238040334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.