ArticleRNA biology2016
Probing-directed identification of novel structured RNAs.
Article in RNA biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrigendum.2016
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcripts often harbor RNA elements, which regulate cell processes co- or post-transcriptionally. The functions of many regulatory RNA elements depend on their structure, thus it is important to determine the structure as well as to scan genomes for structured elements. State of the art ab initio approaches to predict structured RNAs rely on DNA sequence analysis. They use 2 major types of information inferred from a sequence: thermodynamic stability of an RNA structure and evolutionary footprints of base-pair interactions. In recent years, chemical probing of RNA has arisen as an alternative source of structural information. RNA probing experiments detect positions accessible to specific types of chemicals or enzymes indicating their propensity to be in a paired or unpaired state. There exist several strategies to integrate probing data into RNA secondary structure prediction algorithms that substantially improve the prediction quality. However, whether and how probing data could contribute to detection of structured RNAs remains an open question. We previously developed the energy-based approach RNASurface to detect locally optimal structured RNA elements. Here, we integrate probing data into the RNASurface energy model using a general framework. We show that the use of experimental data allows for better discrimination of ncRNAs from other transcripts. Application of RNASurface to genome-wide analysis of the human transcriptome with PARS data identifies previously undetectable segments, with evidence of functionality for some of them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.