Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26732081›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2016

The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI to determine pediatric brain tumor grades and types.

Mériam Koob, Nadine Girard, Badih Ghattas, Slim Fellah, Sylviane Confort-Gouny, Dominique Figarella-Branger, Didier Scavarda

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Applications of machine learning to MR imaging of pediatric low-grade gliomas.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mériam KoobService de Radiopédiatrie/Imagerie 2, CHU de Strasbourg-Hôpital de Hautepierre, 1 Avenue Molière, 67098, Strasbourg Cedex, France. meriam.koob@chru-strasbourg.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3594-6272
Nadine GirardService de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionnelle, APHM Timone, 264, rue Saint Pierre, 13385, Marseille Cedex, France.
Badih GhattasDépartement de Mathématiques, Faculté des Sciences de Luminy, 13385, Marseille, France.
Slim FellahDepartment of Radiological Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, USA.
Sylviane Confort-GounyAix*Marseille Université, CRMBM, UMR CNRS 7339, 13385, Marseille Cedex, France.
Dominique Figarella-BrangerService d'Anatomie Pathologique et de Neuropathologie, APHM Timone, 264, rue Saint Pierre, 13385, Marseille Cedex 5, France.
Didier ScavardaService de Neurochirurgie Pédiatrique, APHM Timone, 264, rue Saint Pierre, 13385, Marseille Cedex 5, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Childhood brain tumors show great histological variability. The goal of this retrospective study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of multimodal MR imaging (diffusion, perfusion, MR spectroscopy) in the distinction of pediatric brain tumor grades and types. Seventy-six patients (range 1 month to 18 years) with brain tumors underwent multimodal MR imaging. Tumors were categorized by grade (I-IV) and by histological type (A-H). Multivariate statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of single and combined MR modalities, and of single imaging parameters to distinguish the different groups. The highest diagnostic accuracy for tumor grading was obtained with diffusion-perfusion (73.24%) and for tumor typing with diffusion-perfusion-MR spectroscopy (55.76%). The best diagnostic accuracy was obtained for tumor grading in I and IV and for tumor typing in embryonal tumor and pilocytic astrocytoma. Poor accuracy was seen in other grades and types. ADC and rADC were the best parameters for tumor grading and typing followed by choline level with an intermediate echo time, CBV for grading and Tmax for typing. Multiparametric MR imaging can be accurate in determining tumor grades (primarily grades I and IV) and types (mainly pilocytic astrocytomas and embryonal tumors) in children.

Indexed as

AdolescentAstrocytomaBrain NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGliomaHumansInfantMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPrognosisBrain neoplasmsChildDiffusion magnetic resonance imagingMagnetic resonance angiographyMagnetic resonance spectroscopy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.