Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26732074›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2017

Bringing Back a Healthy Buzz? Invertebrate Parasites and Reintroductions: A Case Study in Bumblebees.

Mark J F Brown, Anthony W Sainsbury, Rebecca J Vaughan-Higgins, Gavin H Measures, Catherine M Jones, Nikki Gammans

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Complex networks of parasites and pollinators: moving towards a healthy balance.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark J F BrownSchool of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham Hill, Egham, TW20 0EX, UK. mark.brown@rhul.ac.uk.
Anthony W SainsburyInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK.
Rebecca J Vaughan-HigginsWildlife & Conservation, College of Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia.
Gavin H MeasuresNatural England, Suite D, Unex House, Bourges Boulevard, Peterborough, PE1 1NG, UK.
Catherine M JonesSchool of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 NJT, UK.
Nikki GammansBumblebee Conservation Trust, Stirling University Innovation Park, Stirling, FK9 4NF, UK.
Bumblebee Conservation Trust · GBMurdoch University · AUNatural England · GBRoyal Holloway University of London · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBZoological Society of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reintroductions can play a key role in the conservation of endangered species. Parasites may impact reintroductions, both positively and negatively, but few case studies of how to manage parasites during reintroductions exist. Bumblebees are in decline at regional and global scales, and reintroductions can be used to re-establish extinct local populations. Here we report on how the risks associated with parasites are being managed in an ongoing reintroduction of the short-haired bumblebee, Bombus subterraneus, to the UK. Disease risk analysis was conducted and disease risk management plans constructed to design a capture-quarantine-release system that minimised the impacts on both the bumblebees and on their natural parasites. Given that bumblebee parasites are (i) generalists, (ii) geographically ubiquitous, and (iii) show evidence of local adaptation, the disease risk management plan was designed to limit the co-introduction of parasites from the source population in Sweden to the destination site in the UK. Results suggest that this process at best eliminated, or at least severely curtailed the co-introduction of parasites, and ongoing updates of the plan enabled minimization of impacts on natural host-parasite dynamics in the Swedish source population. This study suggests that methods designed for reintroductions of vertebrate species can be successfully applied to invertebrates. Future reintroductions of invertebrates where the parasite fauna is less well known should take advantage of next-generation barcoding and multiple survey years prior to the start of reintroductions, to develop comprehensive disease risk management plans.

Indexed as

Endangered SpeciesAnimalsBeesConservation of Natural ResourcesParasitesconservationdisease risk analysisdisease risk managementparasitesreintroductions

Identifiers

PMID26732074
OpenAlexW2226637470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.