Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26732067›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2016

Mutant generation by allelic exchange and genome resequencing of the biobutanol organism Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824.

Muhammad Ehsaan, Wouter Kuit, Ying Zhang, Stephen T Cartman, John T Heap, Klaus Winzer, Nigel P Minton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Gene essentiality in the solventogenicApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Genetic disruption of the bacterialProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Genetic tools for the electrotrophApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Alleviation of Carbon Catabolite Repression throughApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Single and multiplexed gene repression in solventogenicSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  12. Chromosomal engineering of inducible isopropanol- butanol-ethanol production inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Autotrophic lactate production from HApplied microbiology and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Modulation ofFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
  19. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Sporulation in solventogenic and acetogenic clostridia.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Muhammad EhsaanClostridia Research Group, BBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre (SBRC), University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD UK.
Wouter KuitClostridia Research Group, BBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre (SBRC), University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD UK ; MicCell Bioservices B.V., Edisonstraat 101, 7006 RB Doetinchem, The Netherlands.
Ying ZhangClostridia Research Group, BBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre (SBRC), University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD UK.
Stephen T CartmanClostridia Research Group, BBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre (SBRC), University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD UK ; Intermediates Sustainability, INVISTA Intermediates, Wilton Centre, Redcar, TS10 4RF UK.
John T HeapClostridia Research Group, BBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre (SBRC), University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD UK ; Department of Life Sciences, Centre for Synthetic Biology and Innovation, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ UK.
Klaus WinzerClostridia Research Group, BBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre (SBRC), University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD UK.
Nigel P MintonClostridia Research Group, BBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre (SBRC), University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD UK.
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · GBBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G016224/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M012336/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClostridium acetobutylicum represents a paradigm chassis for the industrial production of the biofuel biobutanol and a focus for metabolic engineering. We have previously developed procedures for the creation of in-frame, marker-less deletion mutants in the pathogen Clostridium difficile based on the use of pyrE and codA genes as counter selection markers. In the current study we sought to test their suitability for use in C. acetobutylicum.

resultsBoth systems readily allowed the isolation of in-frame deletions of the C. acetobutylicum ATCC 824 spo0A and the cac824I genes, leading to a sporulation minus phenotype and improved transformation, respectively. The pyrE-based system was additionally used to inactivate a putative glycogen synthase (CA_C2239, glgA) and the pSOL1 amylase gene (CA_P0168, amyP), leading to lack of production of granulose and amylase, respectively. Their isolation provided the opportunity to make use of one of the key pyrE system advantages, the ability to rapidly complement mutations at appropriate gene dosages in the genome. In both cases, their phenotypes were restored in terms of production of granulose (glgA) and amylase (amyP). Genome re-sequencing of the ATCC 824 COSMIC consortium laboratory strain used revealed the presence of 177 SNVs and 49 Indels, including a 4916-bp deletion in the pSOL1 megaplasmid. A total of 175 SNVs and 48 Indels were subsequently shown to be present in an 824 strain re-acquired (Nov 2011) from the ATCC and are, therefore, most likely errors in the published genome sequence, NC_003030 (chromosome) and NC_001988 (pSOL1).

conclusionsThe codA or pyrE counter selection markers appear equally effective in isolating deletion mutants, but there is considerable merit in using a pyrE mutant as the host as, through the use of ACE (Allele-Coupled Exchange) vectors, mutants created (by whatever means) can be rapidly complemented concomitant with restoration of the pyrE allele. This avoids the phenotypic effects frequently observed with high copy number plasmids and dispenses with the need to add antibiotic to ensure plasmid retention. Our study also revealed a surprising number of errors in the ATCC 824 genome sequence, while at the same time emphasising the need to re-sequence commonly used laboratory strains.

Indexed as

Allelic exchangeClostridium acetobutylicumcodACounter selection markerIn-frame deletionpyrEWhole genome re-sequencing

Identifiers

PMID26732067
PMCPMC4700727
OpenAlexW2223848185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.