Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26732041›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2016

Re-ablation I-131 activity does not predict treatment success in low- and intermediate-risk patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

Marin Prpic, Ivan Kruljac, Davor Kust, Lora S Kirigin, Tomislav Jukic, Nina Dabelic, Ante Bolanca, Zvonko Kusic

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Is secondAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marin PrpicDepartment of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center "Sestre milosrdnice", Vinogradska cesta 29, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia. marin.prpic@kbcsm.hr.
Ivan KruljacDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases "Mladen Sekso", Department of Internal medicine, University Hospital Center "Sestre Milosrdnice", Vinogradska cesta 29, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Davor KustDepartment of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center "Sestre milosrdnice", Vinogradska cesta 29, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Lora S KiriginDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases "Mladen Sekso", Department of Internal medicine, University Hospital Center "Sestre Milosrdnice", Vinogradska cesta 29, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Tomislav JukicDepartment of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center "Sestre milosrdnice", Vinogradska cesta 29, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Nina DabelicDepartment of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center "Sestre milosrdnice", Vinogradska cesta 29, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ante BolancaDepartment of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center "Sestre milosrdnice", Vinogradska cesta 29, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Zvonko KusicDepartment of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center "Sestre milosrdnice", Vinogradska cesta 29, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of different radioactive iodine (I-131) activities used for re-ablation, to compare various combinations of treatment activities, and to identify predictors of re-ablation failure in low- and intermediate-risk differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) patients. The study included 128 consecutive low- and intermediate-risk patients with DTC with ablation failure after total thyroidectomy. Patient characteristics, T status, tumor size, lymph node involvement, postoperative remnant size on whole-body scintigraphy, serum thyroglobulin (Tg), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), anti-Tg antibody (TgAb), and Tg/TSH ratio were analyzed as potential predictors of the re-ablation success. Re-ablation was successful in 113 out of 128 patients (88.3 %). Mean first I-131 activity was 2868 ± 914 MBq (77.5 ± 24.7 mCi) and mean second I-131 activity 3004 ± 699 MBq (81.2 ± 18.9 mCi). There was no association between the first, second, and cumulative activity with re-ablation treatment outcome. Treatment failure was associated with higher Tg levels prior to re-ablation (Tg2) (OR 1.16, 95 % CI 1.05-1.29, P = 0.003) and N1a status (OR 3.89, 95 % CI 1.13-13.41, P = 0.032). After excluding patients with positive-to-negative TgAb conversion, Tg2 level of 3.7 ng/mL predicted treatment failure with a sensitivity of 75.0 %, specificity of 80.5 %, and a negative predictive value of 97.1 %. Patients with positive-to-negative TgAb conversion had higher failure rates (OR 2.96, 95 % CI 0.94-9.29). Re-ablation success was high in all subgroups of patients and I-131 activity did not influence treatment outcome. Tg may serve as a good predictor of re-ablation failure. Patients with positive-to-negative TgAb conversion represent a specific group, in whom Tg level should not be used as a predictive marker of treatment outcome.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAutoantibodiesCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansIodine RadioisotopesMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsThyroglobulinThyroidectomyThyroid NeoplasmsTreatment Outcomeanti-thyroglobulinAutoantibodiesIodine RadioisotopesThyroglobulinAnti-Tg antibodyRadioactive iodineRadioiodine ablationThyroglobulin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.