ArticlePloS one2016
Ribosomal DNA and Plastid Markers Used to Sample Fungal and Plant Communities from Wetland Soils Reveals Complementary Biotas.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Gene Phylogenetic Approach for Identification and Diversity Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- LANDMark: an ensemble approach to the supervised selection of biomarkers in high-throughput sequencing data.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Current Insight into Traditional and Modern Methods in Fungal Diversity Estimates.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Metagenomics Approaches for the Detection and Surveillance of Emerging and Recurrent Plant Pathogens.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- GlobalFungi, a global database of fungal occurrences from high-throughput-sequencing metabarcoding studies.Scientific data · 2020Article
- Reappraising plastid markers of the red algae for phylogenetic community ecology in the genomic era.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
- Small Genomes and Big Data: Adaptation of Plastid Genomics to the High-Throughput Era.Biomolecules · 2019Review
- Article
- Intestinal Bacterial Communities of Trypanosome-Infected and UninfectedFrontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- A new way to contemplate Darwin's tangled bank: how DNA barcodes are reconnecting biodiversity science and biomonitoring.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Though the use of metagenomic methods to sample below-ground fungal communities is common, the use of similar methods to sample plants from their underground structures is not. In this study we use high throughput sequencing of the ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase large subunit (rbcL) plastid marker to study the plant community as well as the internal transcribed spacer and large subunit ribosomal DNA (rDNA) markers to investigate the fungal community from two wetland sites. Observed community richness and composition varied by marker. The two rDNA markers detected complementary sets of fungal taxa and total fungal composition clustered according to primer rather than by site. The composition of the most abundant plants, however, clustered according to sites as expected. We suggest that future studies consider using multiple genetic markers, ideally generated from different primer sets, to detect a more taxonomically diverse suite of taxa compared with what can be detected by any single marker alone. Conclusions drawn from the presence of even the most frequently observed taxa should be made with caution without corroborating lines of evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.