ArticlePharmacogenetics and genomics2016
A comparison of DMET Plus microarray and genome-wide technologies by assessing population substructure.
Article in Pharmacogenetics and genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of ancestry proportions in admixed groups across the Americas using clinical pharmacogenomic SNP panels.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The Advantages and Challenges of Diversity in Pharmacogenomics: Can Minority Populations Bring Us Closer to Implementation?Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2019Review
- The targetable A1 Huntington disease haplotype has distinct Amerindian and European origins in Latin America.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2017Article
- Exploring Variation in Known Pharmacogenetic Variants and its Association with Drug Response in Different Mexican Populations.Pharmaceutical research · 2016Article
- Comparison of genome sequencing and clinical genotyping for pharmacogenes.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2016Article
- A European Spectrum of Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers: Implications for Clinical Pharmacogenomics.PloS one · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe capacity of the Affymetrix drug metabolism enzymes and transporters (DMET) Plus pharmacogenomics genotyping chip to estimate population substructure and cryptic relatedness was evaluated. The results were compared with estimates using genome-wide HapMap data for the same individuals.
methodsFor 301 unrelated individuals, spanning three continental populations and one admixed population, genotypic data were collected using the Affymetrix DMET Plus microarray. Genome-wide data on these individuals were obtained from HapMap release 3. Population substructure was assessed using Eigenstrat and ADMIXTURE software for both platforms. Cryptic relatedness was explored by inbreeding coefficient estimation. Nonparametric tests were used to determine correlations of the analytical results of the two genotyping platforms.
resultsPrincipal components analysis identified population substructure for both datasets, with 15.8 and 16.6% of the total variance explained in the first two principal components for DMET Plus and HapMap data, respectively. ADMIXTURE results correctly identified four subpopulations within each dataset. Nonparametric rank correlations indicated significant associations between analyses with an average ρ=0.7272 (P<10) across the three continental populations and ρ=0.4888 for the admixed population. Concordance correlation coefficients (average ρc=0.9693 across all four subpopulations) strongly indicate concordance between ADMIXTURE results. Inbreeding coefficients were slightly inflated (16 individuals>0.15) using DMET Plus data and no cryptic relatedness was indicated using HapMap data. The inflated inbreeding estimation could be because of the limited number of markers provided by DMET as a random sample of 1832 markers from HapMap also yielded inflated estimates of cryptic relatedness (39 individuals>0.15). Furthermore, use of single nucleotide polymorphisms located in genes involved in metabolism and transport may have different allele frequencies in subpopulations than single nucleotide polymorphisms sampled from the whole genome.
conclusionThe DMET Plus pharmacogenomics genotyping chip is effective in quantifying population substructure across the three continental populations and inferring the presence of an admixed population. On the basis of our results, these microarrays offer sufficient depth for covariate adjustment of population substructure in genomic association studies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.