Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26731402›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Immunodiagnosis of Fasciola gigantica Infection Using Monoclonal Antibody-Based Sandwich ELISA and Immunochromatographic Assay for Detection of Circulating Cathepsin L1 Protease.

Panat Anuracpreeda, Runglawan Chawengkirttikul, Prasert Sobhon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Advancement in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Vaccines againstPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Immunodiagnosis of Fascioliasis in Ruminants by ELISA Method: A Mini-Review.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Standardization of a latex agglutination test for coproantigen detection ofJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Panat AnuracpreedaDivision of Agricultural Science, Mahidol University, Kanchanaburi Campus, Saiyok, Kanchanaburi, Thailand.
Runglawan ChawengkirttikulDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Rama VI Road, Bangkok, Thailand.
Prasert SobhonDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Rama VI Road, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mahidol University · THKanchanaburi Rajabhat University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTropical fasciolosis caused by Fasciola gigantica infection is one of the major diseases infecting ruminants in the tropical regions of Africa and Asia including Thailand. Parasitological diagnosis of fasciolosis is often unreliable and possesses low sensitivity. Therefore, the detection of circulating parasite antigens is thought to be a better alternative for diagnosis of fasciolosis, as it reflects the real parasite burden.

methodsIn this study, we have produced a monoclonal antibody (MoAb) against recombinant F. gigantica cathepsin L1 (rFgCatL1), and developed both sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (sandwich ELISA) and immunochromatographic (IC) test for rapid detection of circulating cathepsin L1 protease (CatL1) in the sera from mice experimentally and cattle naturally infected with Fasciola gigantica. MoAb 4E3 and biotinylated rabbit anti-recombinant CatL1 antibody were selected due to their high reactivities and specificities.

resultsThe lower detection limits of sandwich ELISA and IC test were 3 pg/ml and 0.256 ng/ml, respectively. Sandwich ELISA and IC test could detect F. gigantica infection from day 1 to 35 post infection. In experimental mice, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 95%, 100% and 98.6% (for sandwich ELISA), and 93%, 100% and 98.2% (for IC test), while in natural cattle they were 98.3%, 100% and 99.5% (for sandwich ELISA), and 96.7%, 100% and 99.1% (for IC test).

conclusionsThese two assay methods showed high efficiencies and precisions for diagnosis of fasciolosis by F. gigantica.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibody SpecificityCathepsinsCattleChromatography, AffinityCricetinaeEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFasciolaFascioliasisHelminth ProteinsHost-Parasite InteractionsMaleMesocricetusMiceRabbitsAntibodies, MonoclonalCathepsinsHelminth Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26731402
PMCPMC4701485
OpenAlexW2232536209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.