Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26731245›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Pathways to Care for Critically Ill or Injured Children: A Cohort Study from First Presentation to Healthcare Services through to Admission to Intensive Care or Death.

Peter Hodkinson, Andrew Argent, Lee Wallis, Steve Reid, Rafael Perera, Sian Harrison, Matthew Thompson, Mike English, Ian Maconochie, Alison Ward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Healthcare access for children in a low-income area in Cape Town: A mixed-methods case study.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A mixed-methods study on evaluating an updated, francophone version of ETAT+ training in Madagascar.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Peter HodkinsonDivision of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Andrew ArgentDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Lee WallisDivision of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Steve ReidDirectorate of Primary Health Care, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Rafael PereraNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sian HarrisonNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Matthew ThompsonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States of America.
Mike EnglishNuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, UK and KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ian MaconochiePaediatric Emergency Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK and NIHR BRC funded researcher Imperial College, London.
Alison WardNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 097170Wellcome Trust WT091107MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCritically ill or injured children require prompt identification, rapid referral and quality emergency management. We undertook a study to evaluate the care pathway of critically ill or injured children to identify preventable failures in the care provided.

methodsA year-long cohort study of critically ill and injured children was performed in Cape Town, South Africa, from first presentation to healthcare services until paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission or emergency department death, using expert panel review of medical records and caregiver interview. Main outcomes were expert assessment of overall quality of care; avoidability of severity of illness and PICU admission or death and the identification of modifiable factors.

resultsThe study enrolled 282 children, 252 emergency PICU admissions, and 30 deaths. Global quality of care was graded good in 10% of cases, with half having at least one major impact modifiable factor. Key modifiable factors related to access to care and identification of the critically ill, assessment of severity, inadequate resuscitation, and delays in decision making and referral. Children were transferred with median time from first presentation to PICU admission of 12.3 hours. There was potentially avoidable severity of illness in 185 (74%) of children, and death prior to PICU admission was avoidable in 17/30 (56.7%) of children.

conclusionsThe study presents a novel methodology, examining quality of care across an entire system, and highlighting the complexity of the pathway and the modifiable events amenable to interventions, that could reduce mortality and morbidity, and optimize utilization of scarce critical care resources; as well as demonstrating the importance of continuity and quality of care.

Indexed as

ChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesCritical IllnessEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospital MortalityHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInjury Severity ScoreIntensive Care Units, PediatricMalePatient AdmissionQuality ControlQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID26731245
PMCPMC4712128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.