Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26731156›Full record

ArticleEar and hearing

Longitudinal Predictors of Aided Speech Audibility in Infants and Children.

Ryan W McCreery, Elizabeth A Walker, Meredith Spratford, Ruth Bentler, Lenore Holte, Patricia Roush, Jacob Oleson, John Van Buren, Mary Pat Moeller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Characteristics of Hearing Aid Use in Adolescents Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ryan W McCreery1Center for Audiology, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska, USA; 2Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA; 3Center for Childhood Deafness, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska, USA; 4Department of Otolaryngology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; and 5Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Elizabeth A Walker
Meredith Spratford
Ruth Bentler
Lenore Holte
Patricia Roush
Jacob Oleson
John Van Buren
Mary Pat Moeller

Funding

Outcomes of School-Age Children who are Hard of HearingR01DC009560 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MOELLER, MARY PAT, TOMBLIN, JAMES BRUCE · 2008 to 2017
$13.8M
COMPLEX LISTENING SKILLS IN SCHOOL-AGE HARD OF HEARING CHILDRENR01DC013591 · NIDCD · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI MCCREERY, RYAN W. · 2014 to 2023
$4.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009560NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC009560NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013591NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC013591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAmplification is a core component of early intervention for children who are hard of hearing, but hearing aids (HAs) have unique effects that may be independent from other components of the early intervention process, such as caregiver training or speech and language intervention. The specific effects of amplification are rarely described in studies of developmental outcomes. The primary purpose of this article is to quantify aided speech audibility during the early childhood years and examine the factors that influence audibility with amplification for children in the Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss study.

designParticipants were 288 children with permanent hearing loss who were followed as part of the Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss study. All of the children in this analysis had bilateral hearing loss and wore air-conduction behind-the-ear HAs. At every study visit, hearing thresholds were measured using developmentally appropriate behavioral methods. Data were obtained for a total of 1043 audiometric evaluations across all subjects for the first four study visits. In addition, the aided audibility of speech through the HA was assessed using probe microphone measures. Hearing thresholds and aided audibility were analyzed. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were conducted to determine whether patterns of thresholds and aided audibility were significantly different between ears (left versus right) or across the first four study visits. Furthermore, a cluster analysis was performed based on the aided audibility at entry into the study, aided audibility at the child's final visit, and change in aided audibility between these two intervals to determine whether there were different patterns of longitudinal aided audibility within the sample.

resultsEighty-four percent of children in the study had stable audiometric thresholds during the study, defined as threshold changes <10 dB for any single study visit. There were no significant differences in hearing thresholds, aided audibility, or deviation of the HA fitting from prescriptive targets between ears or across test intervals for the first four visits. Approximately 35% of the children in the study had aided audibility that was below the average for the normative range for the Speech Intelligibility Index based on degree of hearing loss. The cluster analysis of longitudinal aided audibility revealed three distinct groups of children: a group with consistently high aided audibility throughout the study, a group with decreasing audibility during the study, and a group with consistently low aided audibility.

conclusionsThe current results indicated that approximately 65% of children in the study had adequate aided audibility of speech and stable hearing during the study period. Limited audibility was associated with greater degrees of hearing loss and larger deviations from prescriptive targets. Studies of developmental outcomes will help to determine how aided audibility is necessary to affect developmental outcomes in children who are hard of hearing.

Indexed as

Hearing AidsLanguage DevelopmentSpeech PerceptionAudiometry, Pure-ToneCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolCluster AnalysisFemaleHearing Loss, BilateralHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID26731156
PMCPMC4704126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.