ArticleEar and hearing
Longitudinal Predictors of Aided Speech Audibility in Infants and Children.
Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hearing aid fitting and developmental outcomes of children fit according to either the NAL or DSL prescription: fit-to-target, audibility, speech and language abilities.International journal of audiology · 2018Trial
- The Speech Intelligibility Index: Tutorial and Applications for Children Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing.American journal of audiology · 2025Article
- Characteristics of Hearing Aid Use in Adolescents Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2025Article
- Validation of the Greek Parents' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children (PEACH) Rating Scale v.4 for Greek and Greek-Cypriot Children with Typical Hearing.Audiology research · 2025Article
- Comparing criteria for deviation from hearing aid prescriptive targets in children.International journal of audiology · 2024Article
- Tracking Listening Skill Development in Infants and Children with Hearing Loss: A Normative Dataset for the Functional Listening Index-Paediatric (FLI-PChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Predicting wideband real-ear-to-coupler differences in children using wideband acoustic immittance.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023Article
- Predicting children's real-ear-to-coupler differences based on tympanometric data.International journal of audiology · 2023Article
- EEG Alpha Band Responses Reveal Amplification Benefits in Infants with Hearing Loss.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Socio-Economic Status and Language Development in Hearing Loss: A Critical Appraisal.Audiology research · 2023Article
- Quantifying Access to Speech in Children with Hearing Loss: The Influence of the Work of Pat Stelmachowicz on Measures of Audibility.Seminars in hearing · 2023Review
- Article
- Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Results in Northeastern of Iran from 2005 to 2019: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of preventive medicine · 2023Article
- Speech Discrimination in Infancy Predicts Language Outcomes at 30 Months for Both Children with Normal Hearing and Those with Hearing Differences.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Auditory Experience, Speech Sound Production Growth, and Early Literacy in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2022Article
- Multidimensional Family-Centred Early Intervention in Children with Hearing Loss: A Conceptual Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Adherence to Remote Microphone System use at school in children and adolescents with hearing loss.CoDAS · 2022Article
- Comprehensive Audiological Management of Hearing Loss in Children, Including Mild and Unilateral Hearing Loss.Otolaryngologic clinics of North America · 2021Review
- Relationship between Behavioral Infant Speech Perception and Hearing Age for Children with Hearing Loss.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- The School Career of Children With Hearing Loss in Different Primary Educational Settings-A Large Longitudinal Nationwide Study.Journal of deaf studies and deaf education · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAmplification is a core component of early intervention for children who are hard of hearing, but hearing aids (HAs) have unique effects that may be independent from other components of the early intervention process, such as caregiver training or speech and language intervention. The specific effects of amplification are rarely described in studies of developmental outcomes. The primary purpose of this article is to quantify aided speech audibility during the early childhood years and examine the factors that influence audibility with amplification for children in the Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss study.
designParticipants were 288 children with permanent hearing loss who were followed as part of the Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss study. All of the children in this analysis had bilateral hearing loss and wore air-conduction behind-the-ear HAs. At every study visit, hearing thresholds were measured using developmentally appropriate behavioral methods. Data were obtained for a total of 1043 audiometric evaluations across all subjects for the first four study visits. In addition, the aided audibility of speech through the HA was assessed using probe microphone measures. Hearing thresholds and aided audibility were analyzed. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were conducted to determine whether patterns of thresholds and aided audibility were significantly different between ears (left versus right) or across the first four study visits. Furthermore, a cluster analysis was performed based on the aided audibility at entry into the study, aided audibility at the child's final visit, and change in aided audibility between these two intervals to determine whether there were different patterns of longitudinal aided audibility within the sample.
resultsEighty-four percent of children in the study had stable audiometric thresholds during the study, defined as threshold changes <10 dB for any single study visit. There were no significant differences in hearing thresholds, aided audibility, or deviation of the HA fitting from prescriptive targets between ears or across test intervals for the first four visits. Approximately 35% of the children in the study had aided audibility that was below the average for the normative range for the Speech Intelligibility Index based on degree of hearing loss. The cluster analysis of longitudinal aided audibility revealed three distinct groups of children: a group with consistently high aided audibility throughout the study, a group with decreasing audibility during the study, and a group with consistently low aided audibility.
conclusionsThe current results indicated that approximately 65% of children in the study had adequate aided audibility of speech and stable hearing during the study period. Limited audibility was associated with greater degrees of hearing loss and larger deviations from prescriptive targets. Studies of developmental outcomes will help to determine how aided audibility is necessary to affect developmental outcomes in children who are hard of hearing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.