Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26730794›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in supportive and palliative care2016

Fertility preservation and cancer: challenges for adolescent and young adult patients.

Catherine Benedict, Bridgette Thom, Joanne F Kelvin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in supportive and palliative care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cancer and fertility management: FIGO best practice advice.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Sexual and fertility-related adverse effects of medicinal treatment for cancer; a national evaluation among medical oncologists.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine BenedictaDepartment of Medicine, Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, Manhasset bSurvivorship Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Bridgette Thom
Joanne F Kelvin
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USHofstra University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Psychosocial Palliative & Community Research in CancerT32CA009461 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI JENNIFER L HAY, Jamie S. Ostroff · 1985 to 2026
$10.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWith increasing survival rates, fertility is an important quality of life concern for many young cancer patients. There is a critical need for improvements in clinical care to ensure patients are well informed about infertility risks and fertility preservation options and to support them in their reproductive decision-making prior to treatment. RECENT

findingsSeveral barriers prevent fertility from being adequately addressed in the clinical context. Providers' and patients' incomplete or inaccurate understanding of infertility risks exacerbate patients' reproductive concerns. For female patients in particular, making decisions about fertility preservation before treatment often leads to decision conflict, reducing the likelihood of making informed, value-based decisions, and posttreatment regret and distress. Recent empirically based interventions to improve provider training around fertility issues and to support patient decision-making about fertility preservation show promise. SUMMARY: Providers should be knowledgeable about the infertility risks associated with cancer therapies and proactively address fertility with all patients who might one day wish to have a child. Comprehensive counseling should also include related issues such as contraceptive use and health implications of early menopause, regardless of desire for future children. Although the negative psychosocial impact of cancer-related infertility is now well accepted, limited work has been done to explore how to improve clinical management of fertility issues in the context of cancer care. Evidence-based interventions should be developed to address barriers and provide psychosocial and decision-making support to patients who are concerned about their fertility and interested in fertility preservation options.

Indexed as

AdolescentDecision MakingFemaleFertilityFertility PreservationHumansMaleNeoplasmsQuality of LifeStress, PsychologicalYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26730794
PMCPMC4752165
OpenAlexW2233633475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.