Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26730708›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

The Perspectives of Patients on Health-Care for Co-Morbid Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Qualitative Study.

Clement Lo, Dragan Ilic, Helena Teede, Alan Cass, Greg Fulcher, Martin Gallagher, Greg Johnson, Peter G Kerr, Tim Mathew, Kerry Murphy and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The experience of financial burden for people with multimorbidity: A systematic review of qualitative research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Clement LoDiabetes and Vascular Research Program, Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Dragan IlicDepartment of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.
Helena TeedeDiabetes and Vascular Research Program, Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Alan CassMenzies School of Health Research, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia.
Greg FulcherDepartment of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Martin GallagherThe George Institute for Global Health, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Greg JohnsonDiabetes Australia, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Peter G KerrDepartment of Nephrology, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Tim MathewKidney Health Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Kerry MurphyDepartment of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.
Kevan PolkinghorneDepartment of Nephrology, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Rowan WalkerDepartment of Renal Medicine, Alfred Health, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.
Sophia ZoungasDiabetes and Vascular Research Program, Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Monash Health · AUMonash University · AUThe George Institute for Global Health · AUACT GovernmentAlfred Health · AUKidney Health Australia · AUMenzies School of Health Research · AURoyal North Shore Hospital · AU

Funding

Core-010UL1TR001073 · NCATS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI KELLER, MARLA J, SHAMOON, HARRY · 2013 to 2017
$21.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMulti-morbidity due to diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains challenging for current health-systems, which focus on single diseases. As a first step toward health-care improvement, we explored the perspectives of patients and their carers on factors influencing the health-care of those with co-morbid diabetes and CKD.

methodsIn this qualitative study participants with co-morbid diabetes and CKD were purposively recruited using maximal variation sampling from 4 major tertiary health-services from 2 of Australia's largest cities. Separate focus groups were conducted for patients with CKD stages 3, 4 and 5. Findings were triangulated with semi-structured interviews of carers of patients. Discussions were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed.

resultsTwelve focus groups with 58 participants and 8 semi-structured interviews of carers were conducted. Factors influencing health-care of co-morbid diabetes and CKD grouped into patient and health service level factors. Key patient level factors identified were patient self-management, socio-economic situation, and adverse experiences related to co-morbid diabetes and CKD and its treatment. Key health service level factors were prevention and awareness of co-morbid diabetes and CKD, poor continuity and coordination of care, patient and carer empowerment, access and poor recognition of psychological co-morbidity. Health-service level factors varied according to CKD stage with poor continuity and coordination of care and patient and carer empowerment emphasized by participants with CKD stage 4 and 5, and access and poor recognition of psychological co-morbidity emphasised by participants with CKD stage 5 and carers.

conclusionsAccording to patients and their carers the health-care of co-morbid diabetes and CKD may be improved via a preventive, patient-centred health-care model which promotes self-management and that has good access, continuity and coordination of care and identifies and manages psychological morbidity.

Indexed as

CitiesAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaCaregiversComorbidityDiabetes MellitusFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Care SurveysHealth ServicesHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID26730708
PMCPMC4701448
OpenAlexW2222963718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.