Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26730408›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Effects of Fluoxetine and Visual Experience on Glutamatergic and GABAergic Synaptic Proteins in Adult Rat Visual Cortex.

Simon Beshara, Brett R Beston, Joshua G A Pinto, Kathryn M Murphy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. 5-HTRMolecular brain · 2018
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Simon BesharaMcMaster Integrative Neuroscience Discovery and Study (MiNDS) Program, McMaster University , Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada.
Brett R BestonMcMaster Integrative Neuroscience Discovery and Study (MiNDS) Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada; Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behavior, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada; Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, L5L 1C6, ON.
Joshua G A PintoMcMaster Integrative Neuroscience Discovery and Study (MiNDS) Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada; Health Care Investment Banking, Credit Suisse AG, San Francisco, CA 94108.
Kathryn M MurphyMcMaster Integrative Neuroscience Discovery and Study (MiNDS) Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada; Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behavior, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada.
McMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluoxetine has emerged as a novel treatment for persistent amblyopia because in adult animals it reinstates critical period-like ocular dominance plasticity and promotes recovery of visual acuity. Translation of these results from animal models to the clinic, however, has been challenging because of the lack of understanding of how this selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor affects glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic mechanisms that are essential for experience-dependent plasticity. An appealing hypothesis is that fluoxetine recreates a critical period (CP)-like state by shifting synaptic mechanisms to be more juvenile. To test this we studied the effect of fluoxetine treatment in adult rats, alone or in combination with visual deprivation [monocular deprivation (MD)], on a set of highly conserved presynaptic and postsynaptic proteins (synapsin, synaptophysin, VGLUT1, VGAT, PSD-95, gephyrin, GluN1, GluA2, GluN2B, GluN2A, GABAAα1, GABAAα3). We did not find evidence that fluoxetine shifted the protein amounts or balances to a CP-like state. Instead, it drove the balances in favor of the more mature subunits (GluN2A, GABAAα1). In addition, when fluoxetine was paired with MD it created a neuroprotective-like environment by normalizing the glutamatergic gain found in adult MDs. Together, our results suggest that fluoxetine treatment creates a novel synaptic environment dominated by GluN2A- and GABAAα1-dependent plasticity.

Indexed as

AnimalsDominance, OcularEvoked Potentials, VisualFluoxetineGABAergic NeuronsMaleNeuronal PlasticityRats, Long-EvansSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSynapsesVisual CortexFluoxetineSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitorsadult plasticityamblyopiafluoxetinemonocular deprivationreceptorsvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID26730408
PMCPMC4698542
OpenAlexW2258075994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.