ArticleOchsner journal2015
Atypical Retinal Lesion in a Heart Transplant Patient: Investigation and Management.
Article in Ochsner journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2016
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA cardiac transplant patient presented to the Ochsner ophthalmology clinic with flashes of light in the left eye and a retinal lesion of unclear etiology. CASE REPORT: A 59-year-old male cardiac transplant patient was referred by an outside eye physician. Examination of the anterior chamber of his left eye showed inflammation, and a large hypopigmented lesion was discovered in the nasal retina of the left eye. The patient was admitted to the hospital. Empiric treatment was initiated, and all workup results were negative. During the next several days, the patient's retinal lesion extended. A tap of the eye's vitreous and aqueous fluid yielded no diagnosis. The patient underwent a chorioretinal biopsy through a pars plana vitrectomy. Fluid removed from the vitreous cavity was sent for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, and intravitreal antibiotics were injected. The results of the PCR were negative for all organisms. However, the lesion stabilized, and the patient has remained stable on oral valganciclovir.
conclusionCytomegalovirus PCR testing has 95% sensitivity in untreated patients but only 48% sensitivity in patients treated with systemic ganciclovir, foscarnet, or both. Cytomegalovirus retinitis was determined to be a possible diagnosis; however, the possibility exists that the patient had developed a fungal subretinal abscess.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26730237PMC4679314W2194853957What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.