Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26729944›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

The evolution of cooperation based on direct fitness benefits.

Michael Taborsky, Joachim G Frommen, Christina Riehl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparative economics: how studying other primates helps us better understand the evolution of our own economic decision making.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Correlated pay-offs are key to cooperation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  11. The evolution of cooperation based on direct fitness benefits.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael TaborskyBehavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Hinterkappelen, Switzerland michael.taborsky@iee.unibe.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1357-4316
Joachim G FrommenBehavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Hinterkappelen, Switzerland.
Christina RiehlDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionCooperative BehaviorAnimalsGenetic FitnessHumansSelection, Geneticaltruismnatural selectionnon-kin cooperationreciprocitysocial evolution

Identifiers

PMID26729944
PMCPMC4760205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.