Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26729935›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

Adaptations for social cognition in the primate brain.

Michael L Platt, Robert M Seyfarth, Dorothy L Cheney

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
22.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Monkeys Predict US Elections.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Balancing costs and benefits in primates: ecological and palaeoanthropological views.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael L PlattDepartments of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Marketing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Robert M SeyfarthDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Dorothy L CheneyDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA cheney@sas.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Mechanisms Regulating Complex Social BehaviorR01MH108627 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HUETTEL, SCOTT ALLEN, PLATT, MICHAEL L · 2016 to 2025
$7.1M
Neural Circuit Mechanisms Mediating TMS and Oxytocin Effects on Social CognitionR37MH109728 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PLATT, MICHAEL L · 2016 to 2025
$6.7M
Animal Model of Genetics and Social Behavior in Autism Spectrum DisordersR01MH096875 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PLATT, MICHAEL L · 2012 to 2016
$3.6M
Rational Design of TMS for NeuromodulationR01NS088674 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI PETERCHEV, ANGEL V, SOMMER, MARC A · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
Neuronal Basis of Vicarious Reinforcement Dysfunction in Autism Spectrum DisorderR01MH095894 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PLATT, MICHAEL L · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
Pre-clinical evaluation of oxytocin for ASD treatment discoveryR21HD080498 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BAUMAN, MELISSA DAWN, MACHADO, CHRISTOPHER J · 2015 to 2016
$441k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD080498NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095894NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096875NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH108627NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH109728NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of the factors affecting reproductive success in group-living monkeys have traditionally focused on competitive traits, like the acquisition of high dominance rank. Recent research, however, indicates that the ability to form cooperative social bonds has an equally strong effect on fitness. Two implications follow. First, strong social bonds make individuals' fitness interdependent and the 'free-rider' problem disappears. Second, individuals must make adaptive choices that balance competition and cooperation-often with the same partners. The proximate mechanisms underlying these behaviours are only just beginning to be understood. Recent results from cognitive and systems neuroscience provide us some evidence that many social and non-social decisions are mediated ultimately by abstract, domain-general neural mechanisms. However, other populations of neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex, striatum, amygdala and parietal cortex specifically encode the type, importance and value of social information. Whether these specialized populations of neurons arise by selection or through developmental plasticity in response to the challenges of social life remains unknown. Many brain areas are homologous and show similar patterns of activity in human and non-human primates. In both groups, cortical activity is modulated by hormones like oxytocin and by the action of certain genes that may affect individual differences in behaviour. Taken together, results suggest that differences in cooperation between the two groups are a matter of degree rather than constituting a fundamental, qualitative distinction.

Indexed as

CognitionCooperative BehaviorSocial BehaviorAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdaptation, PsychologicalAnimalsBrainFemaleHumansMaleOxytocinPrimatesOxytocincooperationfitnessneuroethologynon-human primatessocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID26729935
PMCPMC4745018
OpenAlexW2273501098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.