Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26729913›Full record

ArticleCold Spring Harbor protocols2016

BioGRID: A Resource for Studying Biological Interactions in Yeast.

Rose Oughtred, Andrew Chatr-aryamontri, Bobby-Joe Breitkreutz, Christie S Chang, Jennifer M Rust, Chandra L Theesfeld, Sven Heinicke, Ashton Breitkreutz, Daici Chen, Jodi Hirschman and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cold Spring Harbor protocols, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Rose OughtredLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544;
Andrew Chatr-aryamontriInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada;
Bobby-Joe BreitkreutzSamuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada;
Christie S ChangLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544;
Jennifer M RustLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544;
Chandra L TheesfeldLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544;
Sven HeinickeLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544;
Ashton BreitkreutzSamuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada;
Daici ChenInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada;
Jodi HirschmanLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544;
Nadine KolasSamuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada;
Michael S LivstoneLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544;
Julie NixonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JR, United Kingdom.
Lara O'DonnellSamuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada;
Lindsay RamageSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JR, United Kingdom.
Andrew WinterSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JR, United Kingdom.
Teresa RegulySamuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada;
Adnane SellamInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada;
Chris StarkSamuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada;
Lorrie BoucherSamuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada;
Kara DolinskiLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544;
Mike TyersInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada; Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada; School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JR, United Kingdom.

Funding

BioGRID: An open resource for biological interactions and network analysisR01OD010929 · OD · SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM · PI KARA DOLINSKI, Mike Tyers · 2012 to 2026
$13.9M
BioGRID: an open resource for biological interactions and network analysisR01RR024031 · NCRR · SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM · PI TYERS, MIKE · 2007 to 2011
$3.2M
Systematic data curation and integration to link models of human diseaseR24OD011194 · OD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI DOLINSKI, KARA · 2012 to 2014
$1.9M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F010486/1Canadian Institutes of Health Research FRN 82940NCRR NIH HHS R01 RR024031NIH HHS R01 OD010929NIH HHS R01OD010929NIH HHS R24 OD011194NIH HHS R24OD011194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Biological General Repository for Interaction Datasets (BioGRID) is a freely available public database that provides the biological and biomedical research communities with curated protein and genetic interaction data. Structured experimental evidence codes, an intuitive search interface, and visualization tools enable the discovery of individual gene, protein, or biological network function. BioGRID houses interaction data for the major model organism species--including yeast, nematode, fly, zebrafish, mouse, and human--with particular emphasis on the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe as pioneer eukaryotic models for network biology. BioGRID has achieved comprehensive curation coverage of the entire literature for these two major yeast models, which is actively maintained through monthly curation updates. As of September 2015, BioGRID houses approximately 335,400 biological interactions for budding yeast and approximately 67,800 interactions for fission yeast. BioGRID also supports an integrated posttranslational modification (PTM) viewer that incorporates more than 20,100 yeast phosphorylation sites curated through its sister database, the PhosphoGRID.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksProtein Interaction MappingAnimalsDatabases, GeneticHumansSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsYeastsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26729913
PMCPMC5975956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.