Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26729762›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2016

Genomic Comparison of Two O111:H- Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli Isolates from a Historic Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome Outbreak in Australia.

Lauren J McAllister, Stephen J Bent, Nicola K Petty, Elizabeth Skippington, Scott A Beatson, James C Paton, Adrienne W Paton

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Is Shiga Toxin-ProducingMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Outbreak of multiple strains of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing and enteropathogenicEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2018
    Article
  9. Recurrent seasonal outbreak of an emerging serotype of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC O55:H7 Stx2a) in the south west of England, July 2014 to September 2015.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lauren J McAllisterResearch Centre for Infectious Diseases, School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Stephen J BentSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Nicola K PettyAustralian Infectious Diseases Research Centre and School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Elizabeth SkippingtonAustralian Infectious Diseases Research Centre and School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Scott A BeatsonAustralian Infectious Diseases Research Centre and School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
James C PatonResearch Centre for Infectious Diseases, School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Adrienne W PatonResearch Centre for Infectious Diseases, School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia adrienne.paton@adelaide.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) is an important cause of diarrhea and hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) worldwide. Australia's worst outbreak of HUS occurred in Adelaide in 1995 and was one of the first major HUS outbreaks attributed to a non-O157 Shiga-toxigenic E. coli (STEC) strain. Molecular analyses conducted at the time suggested that the outbreak was caused by an O111:H(-) clone, with strains from later in the outbreak harboring an extra copy of the genes encoding the potent Shiga toxin 2 (Stx2). Two decades later, we have used next-generation sequencing to compare two isolates from early and late in this important outbreak. We analyzed genetic content, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and prophage insertion sites; for the latter, we demonstrate how paired-end sequence data can be leveraged to identify such insertion sites. The two strains are genetically identical except for six SNP differences and the presence of not one but two additional Stx2-converting prophages in the later isolate. Isolates from later in the outbreak were associated with higher levels of morbidity, suggesting that the presence of the additional Stx2-converting prophages is significant in terms of the virulence of this clone.

Indexed as

AustraliaDisease OutbreaksEnterohemorrhagic Escherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsEscherichia coli ProteinsGenome, BacterialGenomicsHemolytic-Uremic SyndromeHumansPhylogenyEscherichia coli Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26729762
PMCPMC4771340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.