Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26729494›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2016

Combinatorial Pharmacodynamics of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam against Genotypically Defined β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli: Insights into the Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations.

Rachel L Soon, Justin R Lenhard, Zackery P Bulman, Patricia N Holden, Pamela Kelchlin, Judith N Steenbergen, Lawrence V Friedrich, Alan Forrest, Brian T Tsuji

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Inoculum effect of β-lactam antibiotics.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2019
    Review
  5. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2017
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel L SoonLaboratory for Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics, New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Justin R LenhardLaboratory for Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics, New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Zackery P BulmanLaboratory for Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics, New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Patricia N HoldenLaboratory for Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics, New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Pamela KelchlinLaboratory for Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics, New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Judith N SteenbergenMerck & Co., Lexington, Massachusetts, USA.
Lawrence V FriedrichMerck & Co., Lexington, Massachusetts, USA.
Alan ForrestLaboratory for Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics, New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Brian T TsujiLaboratory for Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics, New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA btsuji@buffalo.edu.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a dearth of new agents currently being developed to combat multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, the combination of ceftolozane and tazobactam was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat complicated intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections. To characterize the activity of the combination product, time-kill studies were conducted against 4 strains ofEscherichia colithat differed in the type of β-lactamase they expressed. The four investigational strains included 2805 (no β-lactamase), 2890 (AmpC β-lactamase), 2842 (CMY-10 β-lactamase), and 2807 (CTX-M-15 β-lactamase), with MICs to ceftolozane of 0.25, 4, 8, and >128 mg/liter with no tazobactam, and MICs of 0.25, 1, 4, and 8 mg/liter with 4 mg/liter tazobactam, respectively. All four strains were exposed to a 6 by 5 array of ceftolozane (0, 1, 4, 16, 64, and 256 mg/liter) and tazobactam (0, 1, 4, 16, and 64 mg/liter) over 48 h using starting inocula of 10(6)and 10(8)CFU/ml. While ceftolozane-tazobactam achieved bactericidal activity against all 4 strains, the concentrations of ceftolozane and tazobactam required for a ≥3-log reduction varied between the two starting inocula and the 4 strains. At both inocula, the Hill plots (R(2)> 0.882) of ceftolozane revealed significantly higher 50% effective concentrations (EC50s) at tazobactam concentrations of ≤4 mg/liter than those at concentrations of ≥16 mg/liter (P< 0.01). Moreover, the EC50s at 10(8)CFU/ml were 2.81 to 66.5 times greater than the EC50s at 10(6)CFU/ml (median, 10.7-fold increase;P= 0.002). These promising results indicate that ceftolozane-tazobactam achieves bactericidal activity against a wide range of β-lactamase-producingE. colistrains.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCephalosporinsComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugEscherichia coliGene ExpressionMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPenicillanic AcidTazobactamAmpC beta-lactamasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-lactamase CTX-M-15beta-Lactamasesceftolozane, tazobactam drug combinationCephalosporinsCMY-10 beta-lactamasePenicillanic AcidTazobactam

Identifiers

PMID26729494
PMCPMC4808171
OpenAlexW2319685644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.