ArticleObesity surgery2016
The Impact of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding on an NHS Cohort of Type 2 Diabetics: a Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adjustable gastric band surgery or medical management in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity: three-year results of a randomized trial.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2019Trial
- Type 2 Diabetes Remission After Bariatric Surgery and Its Impact on Healthcare Costs.Obesity surgery · 2023Article
- The Impact of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding on an NHS Cohort of Type 2 Diabetics: a Prospective Cohort Study.Obesity surgery · 2017Article
- Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Obesity surgery · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObesity is an independent risk factor for diabetes, which is associated with significant morbidity and premature death. This study aims to evaluate the impact of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) on a cohort of morbidly obese diabetics.
methodsInclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to consecutive diabetic patients undergoing LAGB. Demographic and disease-specific data were collected at baseline and 6-monthly intervals corresponding to follow-up assessments. Minimum follow-up was 24 months. Normally distributed variables were assessed with one-way analysis of variance/t tests; proportions were analysed with chi-squared/Fisher's exact tests. Follow-up was ≥90 % complete at each time point.
resultsOne hundred twenty patients with a median age of 43.3 years, mean (± standard deviation (SD)) pre-op body mass index (BMI) of 48.7 (±8) kg/m2, and HbA1c of 8.6 (±2) % were included. BMI reduced significantly, with annual post-operative means of 41.4 ± 7.8, 39.9 ± 7.7, 39.5 ± 7.8, 39.3 ± 7.1 and 36.6 ± 5.4 kg/m(2) (p < 0.001). Corresponding percentage excess body weight lost was 32.8 ± 18, 39.8 ± 21.4, 38.5 ± 21.3, 37.0 ± 22.3 and 43.1 ± 14.1 %. HbA1c was significantly lower at each time point until 30 months post-operatively (p < 0.001). Thereafter, differences were insignificant, and HbA1c was comparable to pre-operative levels by 5 years. Seventy-six (63 %) patients achieved an HbA1c <7 % at 30 months (p < 0.001). Twenty-six (23 %) patients achieved remission from diabetes. The cumulative 5-year cost saving from reductions in anti-diabetes medications was £1650/patient. There were no mortalities, and 18 device explants.
conclusionsModest but durable weight loss associated with significant improvements in glycaemic control and anti-diabetic medication use have been demonstrated. Peak effects occur within 24-30 months and diminish thereafter, possibly reflecting progression of pathological processes due to residual obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.