Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26729241›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2015

Hemodynamic coherence and the rationale for monitoring the microcirculation.

Can Ince

5 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 298 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
298citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04593212 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Improving the Assessment of Microcirculatory Dysfunction in Septic Shock Patients Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography at the Bedside

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital da Luz, PortugalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled165ConditionsSeptic ShockArmsOptical Coherence Tomography Angiography
NCT04693923 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Capillary Refill Time Response to a Rapid Fluid Challenge in Septic Shock Patients: Pathophysiological Determinants, and Relation to Changes in Systemic, Regional and Microcirculatory Blood Flow

TypeinterventionalSponsorPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileRan2021 to 2023Enrolled42ConditionsSeptic ShockArmsFluid challenge
NCT05180409 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The Prognostic Value of Simultaneous Assessment of Microcirculation Alteration With Sublingual Microcirculation and Near-infrared Spectroscopy on the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome of Various Phenotypes

TypeobservationalSponsorChang Gung Memorial HospitalRan2020 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
NCT06157320 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Improving Microcirculation and Microvascular Leakage in Sepsis Patients: A Comprehensive Clinical Study of Shenfu Injection

TypeinterventionalSponsorRuijin HospitalRan2023 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsSepsisArmsShen-Fu, Norepinephrine (NE),antibiotics,fluid resuscitation
NCT07172451 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of Balanced Gelatin Solution for Fluid Infusion in Sepsis Patients Undergoing Emergency Abdominal Surgery: A Multicenter, Adaptive Designed, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Zhongshan HospitalRan2026 to 2028Enrolled318ConditionsSepsis, Intra-Abdominal InfectionsArmsBalanced Gelatin Solution, Acetate Ringer's Solution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

298 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Acute effects of energy drink consumption on microvascular reactivity in young male volunteers at rest: a randomized trial.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

238 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Can Ince

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents a personal viewpoint of the shortcoming of conventional hemodynamic resuscitation procedures in achieving organ perfusion and tissue oxygenation following conditions of shock and cardiovascular compromise, and why it is important to monitor the microcirculation in such conditions. The article emphasizes that if resuscitation procedures are based on the correction of systemic variables, there must be coherence between the macrocirculation and microcirculation if systemic hemodynamic-driven resuscitation procedures are to be effective in correcting organ perfusion and oxygenation. However, in conditions of inflammation and infection, which often accompany states of shock, vascular regulation and compensatory mechanisms needed to sustain hemodynamic coherence are lost, and the regional circulation and microcirculation remain in shock. We identify four types of microcirculatory alterations underlying the loss of hemodynamic coherence: type 1, heterogeneous microcirculatory flow; type 2, reduced capillary density induced by hemodilution and anemia; type 3, microcirculatory flow reduction caused by vasoconstriction or tamponade; and type 4, tissue edema. These microcirculatory alterations can be observed at the bedside using direct visualization of the sublingual microcirculation with hand-held vital microscopes. Each of these alterations results in oxygen delivery limitation to the tissue cells despite the presence of normalized systemic hemodynamic variables. Based on these concepts, we propose how to optimize the volume of fluid to maximize the oxygen-carrying capacity of the microcirculation to transport oxygen to the tissues.

Indexed as

CapillariesHemodynamicsHumansMicrocirculationResuscitationShockVasoconstriction

Identifiers

PMID26729241
PMCPMC4699073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.