Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26729112›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2016

Effect of Chromatin Structure on the Extent and Distribution of DNA Double Strand Breaks Produced by Ionizing Radiation; Comparative Study of hESC and Differentiated Cells Lines.

Priyanka Venkatesh, Irina V Panyutin, Evgenia Remeeva, Ronald D Neumann, Igor G Panyutin

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Differentiation Stage Predicts Radiosensitivity in Mesenchymal-Like Pancreatic Cancer.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Genome-wide mapping of genomic DNA damage: methods and implications.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Priyanka VenkateshDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. priy.venkatesh@gmail.com.
Irina V PanyutinDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. ipanyutinv@mail.cc.nih.gov.
Evgenia RemeevaDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. remeeva@gmail.com.
Ronald D NeumannDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. rneumann@mail.cc.nih.gov.
Igor G PanyutinDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. ipanyuting@helix.nih.gov.

Funding

Responses of human stem cells to ionizing radiation exposuresZIACL003007 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI NEUMANN, RONALD · 2014 to 2018
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromatin structure affects the extent of DNA damage and repair. Thus, it has been shown that heterochromatin is more protective against DNA double strand breaks (DSB) formation by ionizing radiation (IR); and that DNA DSB repair may proceed differently in hetero- and euchromatin regions. Human embryonic stem cells (hESC) have a more open chromatin structure than differentiated cells. Here, we study the effect of chromatin structure in hESC on initial DSB formation and subsequent DSB repair. DSB were scored by comet assay; and DSB repair was assessed by repair foci formation via 53BP1 antibody staining. We found that in hESC, heterochromatin is confined to distinct regions, while in differentiated cells it is distributed more evenly within the nuclei. The same dose of ionizing radiation produced considerably more DSB in hESC than in differentiated derivatives, normal human fibroblasts; and one cancer cell line. At the same time, the number of DNA repair foci were not statistically different among these cells. We showed that in hESC, DNA repair foci localized almost exclusively outside the heterochromatin regions. We also noticed that exposure to ionizing radiation resulted in an increase in heterochromatin marker H3K9me3 in cancer HT1080 cells, and to a lesser extent in IMR90 normal fibroblasts, but not in hESCs. These results demonstrate the importance of chromatin conformation for DNA protection and DNA damage repair; and indicate the difference of these processes in hESC.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCell LineChromatinDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedHeterochromatinHuman Embryonic Stem CellsHumansRadiation, IonizingChromatinHeterochromatinchromatin structurehuman embryonic stem cellsionizing radiation

Identifiers

PMID26729112
PMCPMC4730303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.