ArticleScientific reports2016
State-dependent and cell type-specific temporal processing in auditory thalamocortical circuit.
Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Layer 5 and 6b extratelencephalic neurons encode distinct sound features in auditory cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Sleep-like changes in neural processing emerge during sleep deprivation in early auditory cortex.Current biology : CB · 2023Article
- The function of groups of neurons changes from moment to moment.Current opinion in physiology · 2021Article
- Effects of optogenetic stimulation of basal forebrain parvalbumin neurons on Alzheimer's disease pathology.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Article
- Differential cell-type dependent brain state modulations of sensory representations in the non-lemniscal mouse inferior colliculus.Communications biology · 2019Article
- Theta Oscillations Alternate With High Amplitude Neocortical Population Within Synchronized States.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Rebound or Entrainment? The Influence of Alternating Current Stimulation on Individual Alpha.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Article
- Distinct Temporal Coordination of Spontaneous Population Activity between Basal Forebrain and Auditory Cortex.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Ongoing spontaneous activity in cortical circuits defines cortical states, but it still remains unclear how cortical states shape sensory processing across cortical laminae and what type of response properties emerge in the cortex. Recording neural activity from the auditory cortex (AC) and medial geniculate body (MGB) simultaneously with electrical stimulations of the basal forebrain (BF) in urethane-anesthetized rats, we investigated state-dependent spontaneous and auditory-evoked activities in the auditory thalamocortical circuit. BF stimulation induced a short-lasting desynchronized state, with sparser firing and increased power at gamma frequency in superficial layers. In this desynchronized state, the reduction in onset response variability in both AC and MGB was accompanied by cell type-specific firing, with decreased responses of cortical broad spiking cells, but increased responses of cortical narrow spiking cells. This onset response was followed by distinct temporal evolution in AC, with quicker rebound firing in infragranular layers. This temporal profile was associated with improved processing of temporally structured stimuli across AC layers to varying degrees, but not in MGB. Thus, the reduction in response variability during the desynchronized state can be seen subcortically whereas the improvement of temporal tuning emerges across AC layers, emphasizing the importance of state-dependent intracortical processing in hearing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.