Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26728364›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2016

Molecular adsorbent recirculating system and single-pass albumin dialysis in liver failure--a prospective, randomised crossover study.

Christoph Sponholz, Katja Matthes, Dina Rupp, Wolf Backaus, Sebastian Klammt, Diana Karailieva, Astrid Bauschke, Utz Settmacher, Matthias Kohl, Mark G Clemens and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Extracorporeal Liver Support: An Updated Review of Mechanisms and Current Literature.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Christoph SponholzDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Germany. christoph.sponholz@med.uni-jena.de.
Katja MatthesDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Germany. katja.matthes@uni-jena.de.
Dina RuppDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Germany. dina.rupp@uni-jena.de.
Wolf BackausDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Germany. wolf.backaus@uni-jena.de.
Sebastian KlammtCharité Research Organisation, Berlin, Germany. sebastian.klammt@charite-research.org.
Diana KarailievaInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany. diana.karailieva@med.uni-jena.de.
Astrid BauschkeDivision of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany. astrid.bauschke@med.uni-jena.de.
Utz SettmacherDivision of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany. utz.settmacher@med.uni-jena.de.
Matthias KohlDepartment of Medical and Life Sciences, Furtwangen University, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany. matthias.kohl@hs-furtwangen.de.
Mark G ClemensCenter for Sepsis Control and Care, Integrated Treatment and Research Center, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany. mgclemen@uncc.edu.
Steffen MitznerDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany. steffen.mitzner@med.uni-rostock.de.
Michael BauerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Germany. michael.bauer@med.uni-jena.de.
Andreas KortgenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Germany. andreas.kortgen@med.uni-jena.de.
Jena University Hospital · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology · DEFurtwangen University · DEUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of extracorporeal albumin dialysis (ECAD) is to reduce endogenous toxins accumulating in liver failure. To date, ECAD is conducted mainly with the Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System (MARS). However, single-pass albumin dialysis (SPAD) has been proposed as an alternative. The aim of this study was to compare the two devices with a prospective, single-centre, non-inferiority crossover study design with particular focus on reduction of bilirubin levels (primary endpoint) and influence on paraclinical and clinical parameters (secondary endpoints) associated with liver failure.

methodsPatients presenting with liver failure were screened for eligibility and after inclusion were randomly assigned to be started on either conventional MARS or SPAD (with 4% albumin and a dialysis flow rate of 700 ml/h). Statistical analyses were based on a linear mixed-effects model.

resultsSixty-nine crossover cycles of ECAD in 32 patients were completed. Both systems significantly reduced plasma bilirubin levels to a similar extent (MARS: median -68 μmol/L, interquartile range [IQR] -107.5 to -33.5, p = 0.001; SPAD: -59 μmol/L, -84.5 to +36.5, p = 0.001). However, bile acids (MARS: -39 μmol/L, -105.6 to -8.3, p < 0.001; SPAD: -9 μmol/L, -36.9 to +11.4, p = 0.131), creatinine (MARS: -24 μmol/L, -46.5 to -8.0, p < 0.001; SPAD: -2 μmol/L, -9.0 to +7.0/L, p = 0.314) and urea (MARS: -0.9 mmol/L, -1.93 to -0.10, p = 0.024; SPAD: -0.1 mmol/L, -1.0 to +0.68, p = 0.523) were reduced and albumin-binding capacity was increased (MARS: +10%, -0.8 to +20.9%, p < 0.001; SPAD: +7%, -7.5 to +15.5%, p = 0.137) only by MARS. Cytokine levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 and hepatic encephalopathy were altered by neither MARS nor SPAD.

conclusionsBoth procedures were safe for temporary extracorporeal liver support. While in clinical practice routinely assessed plasma bilirubin levels were reduced by both systems, only MARS affected other paraclinical parameters (i.e., serum bile acids, albumin-binding capacity, and creatinine and urea levels). Caution should be taken with regard to metabolic derangements and electrolyte disturbances, particularly in SPAD using regional citrate anti-coagulation.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register ( www.drks.de) DRKS00000371. Registered 8 April 2010.

Indexed as

Bile Acids and SaltsBilirubinBiomarkersCreatinineCross-Over StudiesExtracorporeal CirculationFemaleFluid TherapyHumansLiver FailureMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRenal DialysisSerum AlbuminUreaBile Acids and SaltsBilirubinBiomarkersCreatinineSerum AlbuminUrea

Identifiers

PMID26728364
PMCPMC4699252
OpenAlexW2209456935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.