Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26728197›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2016

Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis in ticks and rodents from urban and natural habitats of South-Western Slovakia.

Zuzana Hamšíková Svitálková, Danka Haruštiaková, Lenka Mahríková, Michala Mojšová, Lenka Berthová, Mirko Slovák, Elena Kocianová, Muriel Vayssier-Taussat, Mária Kazimírová

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Pathogen diversity of the neglected winter tickCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Molecular Surveillance ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The role of wildlife in the epidemiology of tick-borne diseases in Slovakia.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Investigation of Tick-Borne Pathogens inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. 'New microbes and new infections · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Zuzana Hamšíková SvitálkováInstitute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 84506, Bratislava, Slovakia. svitalkova@gmail.com.
Danka HaruštiakováInstitute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine and Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 3, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic. harustiakova@iba.muni.cz.
Lenka MahríkováInstitute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 84506, Bratislava, Slovakia. lenka.mydlova@gmail.com.
Michala MojšováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynská Dolina B-1, 84215, Bratislava, Slovakia. mojsova.michala@gmail.com.
Lenka BerthováInstitute of Virology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 84505, Bratislava, Slovakia. lenka.berthova@gmail.com.
Mirko SlovákInstitute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 84506, Bratislava, Slovakia. slovak.mirko@gmail.com.
Elena KocianováInstitute of Virology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 84505, Bratislava, Slovakia. ela.kocianova@gmail.com.
Muriel Vayssier-TaussatUMR BIPAR, Anses, 23 Avenue du Général de Gaulle, 94700, Maisons-Alfort, France. mvayssier@vet-alfort.fr.
Mária KazimírováInstitute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 84506, Bratislava, Slovakia. maria.kazimirova@savba.sk.
Institute of Zoology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKSlovak Academy of Sciences · SKBipar · FRComenius University Bratislava · SKMasaryk University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCandidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis (CNM) is an emerging tick-borne pathogen causing severe disease in immunocompromised patients. In Europe, Ixodes ricinus is the primary vector and rodents act as reservoir hosts. New data on the prevalence of CNM in ticks and rodents contribute to the knowledge on the distribution of endemic areas and circulation of the bacterium in natural foci.

methodsQuesting ticks were collected and rodents were trapped in urban/suburban and natural habitats in South-Western Slovakia from 2011 to 2014. DNA from questing and rodent-attached ticks and rodent tissues were screened for CNM by real-time PCR. Rodent spleen samples positive for CNM were characterised at the groEL gene locus. Spatial and temporal differences in CNM prevalence in ticks and rodents and co-infections of ticks with CNM and Anaplasma phagocytophilum were analysed.

resultsThe presence of CNM was confirmed in questing and rodent-attached I. ricinus ticks and in rodents. Total prevalence in both ticks and rodents was significantly higher in the natural habitat (2.3% and 10.1%, respectively) than in the urban/suburban habitat (1.0% and 3.3%, respectively). No seasonal pattern in CNM prevalence in ticks was observed, but prevalence in rodents was higher in autumn than in spring. CNM was detected in Apodemus flavicollis, Myodes glareolus, Microtus arvalis and Micromys minutus, with the highest prevalence in M. arvalis (30%). By screening CNM dissemination in rodent tissues, infection was detected in lungs of all specimens with positive spleens and in blood, kidney, liver and skin of part of those individuals. Infection with CNM was detected in 1.3% of rodent attached I. ricinus ticks. Sequences of a fragment of the groEL gene from CNM-positive rodents showed a high degree of identity with sequences of the gene amplified from ticks and infected human blood from Europe. Only 0.1% of CNM-positive questing ticks carried A. phagocytophilum. Ticks infected with CNM prevailed in the natural habitat (67.2%), whereas ticks infected with A. phagocytophilum prevailed in the urban/suburban habitat (75.0%).

conclusionThe study confirmed the circulation of CNM between I. ricinus ticks and rodents in South-Western Slovakia, and indicates a potential risk of contracting human infections.

Indexed as

Anaplasma phagocytophilumAnaplasmataceaeAnaplasmataceae InfectionsAnimalsArachnid VectorsCoinfectionDisease ReservoirsEcosystemEhrlichiosisFemaleHumansIxodesMaleRiskRodentiaSlovakia

Identifiers

PMID26728197
PMCPMC4700745
OpenAlexW2230605796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.