Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26727904›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurovirology2016

Toxicity and in vitro activity of HIV-1 latency-reversing agents in primary CNS cells.

Lachlan R Gray, Hung On, Emma Roberts, Hao K Lu, Michael A Moso, Jacqueline A Raison, Catherine Papaioannou, Wan-Jung Cheng, Anne M Ellett, Jonathan C Jacobson and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurovirology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pharmacology of HIV Cure: Site of Action.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2021
    Review
  9. μ-Lat: A mouse model to evaluate human immunodeficiency virus eradication strategies.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Impact of Myeloid Reservoirs in HIV Cure Trials.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Current and Future Therapeutic Strategies for Lentiviral Eradication from Macrophage Reservoirs.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lachlan R GrayCentre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, 3004, VIC, Australia. lachlang@burnet.edu.au.
Hung OnCentre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, 3004, VIC, Australia.
Emma RobertsCentre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, 3004, VIC, Australia.
Hao K LuCentre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, 3004, VIC, Australia.
Michael A MosoCentre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, 3004, VIC, Australia.
Jacqueline A RaisonCentre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, 3004, VIC, Australia.
Catherine PapaioannouCentre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, 3004, VIC, Australia.
Wan-Jung ChengCentre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, 3004, VIC, Australia.
Anne M EllettCentre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, 3004, VIC, Australia.
Jonathan C JacobsonDoherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Damian F J PurcellDoherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Steve L WesselinghCentre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, 3004, VIC, Australia.
Paul R GorryCentre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, 3004, VIC, Australia.
Sharon R LewinCentre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, 3004, VIC, Australia.
Melissa J ChurchillCentre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, 3004, VIC, Australia. churchil@burnet.edu.au.
Burnet Institute · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUMonash University · AUPeter Doherty Institute · AUSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

Viral reservoirs and sanctuaries in HAART - treated patients: role and mechanismsU19AI096109 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HECHT, FREDERICK M · 2011 to 2015
$29.5M
Temporally precise control of theta oscillationsR21MH100354 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LEUTGEB, STEFAN · 2013 to 2014
$404k
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI096109NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH100354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the success of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), HIV persists in long lived latently infected cells in the blood and tissue, and treatment is required lifelong. Recent clinical studies have trialed latency-reversing agents (LRA) as a method to eliminate latently infected cells; however, the effects of LRA on the central nervous system (CNS), a well-known site of virus persistence on cART, are unknown. In this study, we evaluated the toxicity and potency of a panel of commonly used and well-known LRA (panobinostat, romidepsin, vorinostat, chaetocin, disulfiram, hexamethylene bisacetamide [HMBA], and JQ-1) in primary fetal astrocytes (PFA) as well as monocyte-derived macrophages as a cellular model for brain perivascular macrophages. We show that most LRA are non-toxic in these cells at therapeutic concentrations. Additionally, romidepsin, JQ-1, and panobinostat were the most potent at inducing viral transcription, with greater magnitude observed in PFA. In contrast, vorinostat, chaetocin, disulfiram, and HMBA all demonstrated little or no induction of viral transcription. Together, these data suggest that some LRA could potentially activate transcription in latently infected cells in the CNS. We recommend that future trials of LRA also examine the effects of these agents on the CNS via examination of cerebrospinal fluid.

Indexed as

AcetamidesAstrocytesAzepinesCell LineCell SurvivalDepsipeptidesDisulfiramFetusHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHIV-1HumansHydroxamic AcidsIndolesMacrophagesNeuronsPanobinostatAcetamidesAzepineschaetocinDepsipeptidesDisulfiramhexamethylene bisacetamideHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHydroxamic AcidsIndoles(+)-JQ1 compoundPanobinostatPiperazinesromidepsinTriazolesVorinostatCNSHIV-1LatencyLatency-reversing agentsReservoirsToxicity

Identifiers

PMID26727904
OpenAlexW2227331227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.