Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26727594›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Cell to Cell Variability of Radiation-Induced Foci: Relation between Observed Damage and Energy Deposition.

Gaëtan Gruel, Carmen Villagrasa, Pascale Voisin, Isabelle Clairand, Marc Benderitter, Jean-François Bottollier-Depois, Joan Francesc Barquinero

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gaëtan GruelDepartment of Human Health Radiation Protection, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay aux Roses, France.
Carmen VillagrasaDepartment of Human Health Radiation Protection, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay aux Roses, France.
Pascale VoisinDepartment of Human Health Radiation Protection, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay aux Roses, France.
Isabelle ClairandDepartment of Human Health Radiation Protection, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay aux Roses, France.
Marc BenderitterDepartment of Human Health Radiation Protection, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay aux Roses, France.
Jean-François Bottollier-DepoisDepartment of Human Health Radiation Protection, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay aux Roses, France.
Joan Francesc BarquineroDepartment of Human Health Radiation Protection, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay aux Roses, France.
Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most studies that aim to understand the interactions between different types of photon radiation and cellular DNA assume homogeneous cell irradiation, with all cells receiving the same amount of energy. The level of DNA damage is therefore generally determined by averaging it over the entire population of exposed cells. However, evaluating the molecular consequences of a stochastic phenomenon such as energy deposition of ionizing radiation by measuring only an average effect may not be sufficient for understanding some aspects of the cellular response to this radiation. The variance among the cells associated with this average effect may also be important for the behaviour of irradiated tissue. In this study, we accurately estimated the distribution of the number of radiation-induced γH2AX foci (RIF) per cell nucleus in a large population of endothelial cells exposed to 3 macroscopic doses of gamma rays from 60Co. The number of RIF varied significantly and reproducibly from cell to cell, with its relative standard deviation ranging from 36% to 18% depending on the macroscopic dose delivered. Interestingly, this relative cell-to-cell variability increased as the dose decreased, contrary to the mean RIF count per cell. This result shows that the dose effect, in terms of the number of DNA lesions indicated by RIF is not as simple as a purely proportional relation in which relative SD is constant with dose. To analyse the origins of this observed variability, we calculated the spread of the specific energy distribution for the different target volumes and subvolumes in which RIF can be generated. Variances, standard deviations and relative standard deviations all changed similarly from dose to dose for biological and calculated microdosimetric values. This similarity is an important argument that supports the hypothesis of the conservation of the association between the number of RIF per nucleus and the specific energy per DNA molecule. This comparison allowed us to calculate a volume of 1.6 μm3 for which the spread of the specific energy distribution could explain the entire variability of RIF counts per cell in an exposed cell population. The definition of this volume may allow to use a microdosimetric quantity to predict heterogeneity in DNA damage. Moreover, this value is consistent with the order of magnitude of the volume occupied by the hydrated sugar-phosphate backbone of the DNA molecule, which is the part of the DNA molecule responsible for strand breaks.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNAHistonesHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsDNAH2AX protein, humanHistones

Identifiers

PMID26727594
PMCPMC4699766
OpenAlexW2225135041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.