Trial reportPloS one2016
Individualized Mutation Detection in Circulating Tumor DNA for Monitoring Colorectal Tumor Burden Using a Cancer-Associated Gene Sequencing Panel.
Trial report in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circulating tumor DNA dynamically predicts response and/or relapse in patients with hematological malignancies.International journal of hematology · 2018Trial
- Diagnostic performance of droplet digital PCR for KRAS mutation analysis in pancreatic cancer cytology specimens.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- mSEPT9 performs better than CEA in NAT response and MRD assessment and recurrence prediction of stage III CRC.Biomarkers in medicine · 2025Article
- Blood-based liquid biopsy: insights into early detection, prediction, and treatment monitoring of bladder cancer.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2023Review
- Frequent post-operative monitoring of colorectal cancer using individualised ctDNA validated by multiregional molecular profiling.British journal of cancer · 2021Observational
- The Application of Circulating Tumor DNA in the Screening, Surveillance, and Treatment Monitoring of Colorectal Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2021Review
- Comprehensive Gene Mutation Profiling of Circulating Tumor DNA in Ovarian Cancer: Its Pathological and Prognostic Impact.Cancers · 2020Article
- Circulating Tumor DNA as a Preoperative Marker of Recurrence in Patients with Peritoneal Metastases of Colorectal Cancer: A Clinical Feasibility Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Circulating tumor DNA quantity is related to tumor volume and both predict survival in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.International journal of cancer · 2020Article
- Article
- Microfluidic Technologies for cfDNA Isolation and Analysis.Micromachines · 2019Review
- The Use of Circulating Tumor DNA to Monitor and Predict Response to Treatment in Colorectal Cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Review
- Implementing TMB measurement in clinical practice: considerations on assay requirements.ESMO open · 2019Article
- Identification of Common and Subtype-Specific Mutated Sub-Pathways for a Cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Circulating tumor DNA sequencing for colorectal cancers: A comparative analysis of colon cancer and rectal cancer data.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2019Article
- Circulating tumor DNA detectable in early- and late-stage colorectal cancer patients.Bioscience reports · 2018Article
- Liquid biopsy by NGS: differential presence of exons (DPE) in cell-free DNA reveals different patterns in metastatic and nonmetastatic colorectal cancer.Cancer medicine · 2018Article
- Liquid Biopsy in Clinical Management of Breast, Lung, and Colorectal Cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2018Review
- Evaluation of pre-analytical conditions and comparison of the performance of several digital PCR assays for the detection of majorOncotarget · 2017Article
- Current and Emerging Applications of Droplet Digital PCR in Oncology.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) carries information on tumor burden. However, the mutation spectrum is different among tumors. This study was designed to examine the utility of ctDNA for monitoring tumor burden based on an individual mutation profile. METHODOLOGY: DNA was extracted from a total of 176 samples, including pre- and post-operational plasma, primary tumors, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), from 44 individuals with colorectal tumor who underwent curative resection of colorectal tumors, as well as nine healthy individuals. Using a panel of 50 cancer-associated genes, tumor-unique mutations were identified by comparing the single nucleotide variants (SNVs) from tumors and PBMCs with an Ion PGM sequencer. A group of the tumor-unique mutations from individual tumors were designated as individual marker mutations (MMs) to trace tumor burden by ctDNA using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). From these experiments, three major objectives were assessed: (a) Tumor-unique mutations; (b) mutation spectrum of a tumor; and (c) changes in allele frequency of the MMs in ctDNA after curative resection of the tumor.
resultsA total of 128 gene point mutations were identified in 27 colorectal tumors. Twenty-six genes were mutated in at least 1 sample, while 14 genes were found to be mutated in only 1 sample, respectively. An average of 2.7 genes were mutated per tumor. Subsequently, 24 MMs were selected from SNVs for tumor burden monitoring. Among the MMs found by ddPCR with > 0.1% variant allele frequency in plasma DNA, 100% (8 out of 8) exhibited a decrease in post-operation ctDNA, whereas none of the 16 MMs found by ddPCR with < 0.1% variant allele frequency in plasma DNA showed a decrease.
conclusionsThis panel of 50 cancer-associated genes appeared to be sufficient to identify individual, tumor-unique, mutated ctDNA markers in cancer patients. The MMs showed the clinical utility in monitoring curatively-treated colorectal tumor burden if the allele frequency of MMs in plasma DNA is above 0.1%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.