Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26727407›Full record

Trial reportJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2016

A multisite randomized trial of normative feedback for heavy drinking: Social comparison versus social comparison plus correction of normative misperceptions.

Clayton Neighbors, Melissa A Lewis, Joseph LaBrie, Angelo M DiBello, Chelsie M Young, Dipali V Rinker, Dana Litt, Lindsey M Rodriguez, C Raymond Knee, Ezekiel Hamor and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Personalized normative feedback for hazardous drinking among college women: Differential outcomes by history of incapacitated rape.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2023
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cognitive factors and addiction.Current opinion in psychology · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Clayton NeighborsDepartment of Psychology.
Melissa A LewisDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Joseph LaBrieDepartment of Psychology.
Angelo M DiBelloDepartment of Psychology.
Chelsie M YoungDepartment of Psychology.
Dipali V RinkerDepartment of Psychology.
Dana LittDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Lindsey M RodriguezDepartment of Psychology.
C Raymond KneeDepartment of Psychology.
Ezekiel HamorDepartment of Psychology.
Jessica M JerabeckDepartment of Psychology.
Mary E LarimerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.

Funding

Social Norms and Alcohol Prevention (SNAP)R01AA014576 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI NEIGHBORS, CLAYTON · 2004 to 2015
$4.0M
Developing a Dual-Process Intervention for Alcohol Use among Young AdultsR00AA020869 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LITT, DANA M · 2014 to 2016
$729k
NIAAA NIH HHS R00 AA020869NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA014576NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA014576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGiven widespread alcohol misuse among college students, numerous intervention programs have been developed, including personalized normative feedback (PNF). Most research evaluating PNF assumes that presenting one's own perceived norms is necessary to correct normative misperceptions and thereby reduce drinking. Alternatively, simply providing social comparison information showing that one drinks more than others may be sufficient. The present study evaluated the efficacy of full PNF (one's own drinking, campus drinking rates, and perceived norms) and a partial personalized social comparison feedback (PSCF; one's own drinking and campus drinking rates) in a randomized trial among heavy-drinking college students.

methodParticipants included 623 heavy-drinking students from 3 universities. Assessments occurred at baseline and 3- and 6-months postbaseline.

resultsPrimary analyses examined differences across 4 drinking outcomes (drinks per week, total drinks past month, frequency of past month drinking, and negative alcohol-related consequences) at 3- and 6-month follow-ups controlling for the baseline variable. Results revealed significant reductions across all alcohol consumption outcomes at 3 months in both intervention conditions compared to attention-control. Mediation analyses demonstrated significant indirect effects of the intervention on 6-month drinking through changes in perceived norms at 3 months. Moreover, evidence emerged for changes in drinking at 3 months as a mediator of the association between PSCF and 6-month perceived norms.

conclusionsThe present research suggests PNF may not require explicit consideration of one's perceived norms to be effective and that direct social comparison provides an alternative theoretical mechanism for PNF efficacy.

Indexed as

Social NormsAlcohol Drinking in CollegeBehavior TherapyBinge DrinkingFemaleHumansMaleStudentsUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26727407
PMCPMC4760856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.