Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26727311›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics2015

DNA methylation profiling to assess pathogenicity of BRCA1 unclassified variants in breast cancer.

Kirsty J Flower, Natalie S Shenker, Mona El-Bahrawy, David E Goldgar, Michael T Parsons, KConFab Investigators, Affect Study Group, Amanda B Spurdle, Joanna R Morris, Robert Brown and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Peripheral bloodJournal of gynecologic oncology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Kirsty J Flowera Epigenetics Unit; Department of Surgery and Cancer; Imperial College London ; UK.
Natalie S Shenkera Epigenetics Unit; Department of Surgery and Cancer; Imperial College London ; UK.
Mona El-Bahrawyb Department of Histopathology ; Hammersmith Hospital; Imperial College London ; UK.
David E Goldgarc Huntsman Cancer Institute; University of Utah ; Salt Lake City , UT , USA.
Michael T Parsonsd QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute ; Brisbane , QLD , Australia.
KConFab Investigators
Affect Study Group
Amanda B Spurdled QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute ; Brisbane , QLD , Australia.
Joanna R Morrisf Genome Stability Unit; School of Cancer Sciences; University of Birmingham ; UK.
Robert Browna Epigenetics Unit; Department of Surgery and Cancer; Imperial College London ; UK.
James M Flanagana Epigenetics Unit; Department of Surgery and Cancer; Imperial College London ; UK.
Imperial College London · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUHammersmith Hospital · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 13086Cancer Research UK A13086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Germline pathogenic mutations in BRCA1 increase risk of developing breast cancer. Screening for mutations in BRCA1 frequently identifies sequence variants of unknown pathogenicity and recent work has aimed to develop methods for determining pathogenicity. We previously observed that tumor DNA methylation can differentiate BRCA1-mutated from BRCA1-wild type tumors. We hypothesized that we could predict pathogenicity of variants based on DNA methylation profiles of tumors that had arisen in carriers of unclassified variants. We selected 150 FFPE breast tumor DNA samples [47 BRCA1 pathogenic mutation carriers, 65 BRCAx (BRCA1-wild type), 38 BRCA1 test variants] and analyzed a subset (n=54) using the Illumina 450K methylation platform, using the remaining samples for bisulphite pyrosequencing validation. Three validated markers (BACH2, C8orf31, and LOC654342) were combined with sequence bioinformatics in a model to predict pathogenicity of 27 variants (independent test set). Predictions were compared with standard multifactorial likelihood analysis. Prediction was consistent for c.5194-12G>A (IVS 19-12 G>A) (P>0.99); 13 variants were considered not pathogenic or likely not pathogenic using both approaches. We conclude that tumor DNA methylation data alone has potential to be used in prediction of BRCA1 variant pathogenicity but is not independent of estrogen receptor status and grade, which are used in current multifactorial models to predict pathogenicity.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationGenes, BRCA1Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseBreast NeoplasmsComputational BiologyDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGenetic MarkersHumansGenetic MarkersBRCA1breast cancerepigeneticmethylationvariants

Identifiers

PMID26727311
PMCPMC4844213
OpenAlexW2237701571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.