Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26727218›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

HIV Envelope Trimer Specific Immune Response Is Influenced by Different Adjuvant Formulations and Heterologous Prime-Boost.

Juliana de Souza Apostólico, Silvia Beatriz Boscardin, Márcio Massao Yamamoto, Jethe Nunes de Oliveira-Filho, Jorge Kalil, Edecio Cunha-Neto, Daniela Santoro Rosa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Highly efficient production of HIV-1Journal of virology · 2025
    Article
  2. The recent advances in vaccine adjuvants.Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Developments in Vaccine Adjuvants.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  6. CD4Vaccines · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Old and new adjuvants.Current opinion in immunology · 2017
    Review
  13. Adjuvants: Classification, Modus Operandi, and Licensing.Journal of immunology research · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juliana de Souza ApostólicoDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP/EPM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Silvia Beatriz BoscardinDepartment of Parasitology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Márcio Massao YamamotoDepartment of Parasitology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jethe Nunes de Oliveira-FilhoDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP/EPM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Jorge KalilHeart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo-School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
Edecio Cunha-NetoHeart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo-School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniela Santoro RosaDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP/EPM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of a preventive vaccine against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) infection is the most efficient method to control the epidemic. The ultimate goal is to develop a vaccine able to induce specific neutralizing, non-neutralizing antibodies and cellular mediated immunity (CMI). Humoral and CMI responses can be directed to glycoproteins that are normally presented as a trimeric spike on the virus surface (gp140). Despite safer, subunit vaccines are normally less immunogenic/effective and need to be delivered together with an adjuvant. The choice of a suitable adjuvant can induce effective humoral and CMI that utterly lead to full protection against disease. In this report, we established a hierarchy of adjuvant potency on humoral and CMI when admixed with the recombinant HIV gp140 trimer. We show that vaccination with gp140 in the presence of different adjuvants can induce high-affinity antibodies, follicular helper T cells and germinal center B cells. The data show that poly (I:C) is the most potent adjuvant to induce specific CMI responses evidenced by IFN-γ production and CD4+/CD8+ T cell proliferation. Furthermore, we demonstrate that combining some adjuvants like MPL plus Alum and MPL plus MDP exert additive effects that impact on the magnitude and quality of humoral responses while mixing MDP with poly (I:C) or with R848 had no impact on total IgG titers but highly impact IgG subclass. In addition, heterologous DNA prime- protein boost yielded higher IgG titers when compare to DNA alone and improved the quality of humoral response when compare to protein immunization as evidenced by IgG1/IgG2a ratio. The results presented in this paper highlight the importance of selecting the correct adjuvant-antigen combination to potentiate desired cells for optimal stimulation.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsB-Lymphocytesenv Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusFemaleHumansImmunologic MemoryMiceMice, Inbred BALB CT-Lymphocytes, Helper-InducerAdjuvants, Immunologicenv Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virusgp140 envelope protein, Human immunodeficiency virus 1

Identifiers

PMID26727218
PMCPMC4699765
OpenAlexW2225044359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.