Erratum: The relationship of the local food environment with obesity: A systematic review of methods, study quality, and results.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Associations between State-Level Obesity Rates, Engagement with Food Brands on Social Media, and Hashtag Usage.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
   Article
2. Local fast-food environment, diet and blood pressure: the moderating role of mastery.European journal of nutrition · 2019
   Article
3. Accumulating Data to Optimally Predict Obesity Treatment (ADOPT) Core Measures: Environmental Domain.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2018
   Article
4. Status report - Geographic retail food environment measures for use in public health.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2017
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  The relationship of the local food environment with obesity: A systematic review of methods, study quality, and results.2015

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.